Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider supporting user-defined layer legend #24

Closed
rjsmitre opened this issue Mar 19, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Consider supporting user-defined layer legend #24

rjsmitre opened this issue Mar 19, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@rjsmitre
Copy link

Since the Navigator (rightly) doesn't define the semantics of what particular colors are intended to denote in a layer, consider adding the ability for the user to define an optional "legend" for a layer. This legend would allow the user to manually pick a color and associate descriptive text with that color. For example, a user might define a legend as follows:
(selecting red) "SEVERE Risk"
(selecting yellow) "MODERATE Risk"
(selecting green) "LOW Risk"

The Navigator could include the legend on print/export and provide an interface to add/edit the legend.

@jburns12 jburns12 added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 21, 2018
@jcburgoon
Copy link

I was planning on opening an issue for the same thing :)

@CollinFingar CollinFingar self-assigned this Apr 3, 2018
@CollinFingar
Copy link

A legend was added and pushed to the develop branch. It's in the bottom right corner and is capable of displaying many items with customizable colors and labels. The legend is saved and loaded with each layer file. Check out the help page for more info.

@isaisabel isaisabel added this to the Version 2.0 milestone May 10, 2018
gitbook-com bot pushed a commit to FuNianTongXue/attack-navigator that referenced this issue Dec 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants