Update _do_enforcements from base_planning_svc.py

[pierregi]

Description

Update _do_enforcements so it does enforcement for all the items on the list of requirements of every module and not only on the first one of each module.
On the ability file, relationship_match is a list but, on _do_enforcements only the first item is tested. With this modification all of the list will be tested one relationship by one.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

I self tested running ability with requirements with multiple relationship_match.

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

[github-actions]

This issue is stale because it has been open 20 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days

[clenk]

This is a good change. It allows requirements that use the same module to be specified in the yaml like

  requirements:
    - plugins.stockpile.app.requirements.basic:
      - source: foo
        edge: has_bar
        target: fizz
      - source: fizz
        edge: has_buzz
        target: foo

instead of

  requirements:
    - plugins.stockpile.app.requirements.basic:
      - source: foo
        edge: has_bar
        target: fizz
    - plugins.stockpile.app.requirements.basic:
      - source: fizz
        edge: has_buzz
        target: foo

I tested with both yaml styles before and after the proposed change, and confirmed that the change works as expected.

I do not think the test errors/warnings are related to the changes in this PR as they are also present on other PRs.

[elegantmoose]

Looks good @pierregi

[elegantmoose]

Yea its the CI pipeline complaining bc the PR is from an external branch.