Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Latency correction #5967

Closed
mixxxbot opened this issue Aug 22, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

Latency correction #5967

mixxxbot opened this issue Aug 22, 2022 · 6 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@mixxxbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Reported by: ferranpujolcamins
Date: 2011-08-16T19:33:31Z
Status: Fix Released
Importance: Wishlist
Launchpad Issue: lp827599


It would be nice if Mixxx would have a latency correction function.
For example, assume you have 21ms of latency, then a track will start to play 21ms after the point it was stopped. This way you can start your track in sync much easier.
Not only could this correct sound output latency, but also controller input latency and even "human" latency. It could be done with a latency test placed in preferences. Mixxx would play a beep and measure the time that takes the user to use the controller or the keyboard and the time it takes to receive that message.

@mixxxbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: Pegasus-RPG
Date: 2011-08-16T19:51:50Z


That's a good idea and I think we can make it work without too much trouble. I really like the "human latency correction" idea! Not sure how useful it would be in practice, but still interesting to see if it helps anyone.

@mixxxbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: ferranpujolcamins
Date: 2011-08-16T21:04:06Z


If Mixxx asks for the user to do this "human latency correction" not one but many times, the program will be able to "learn" how that particular human responds and help him to stay in sync. It would be kind of an abstraction: the user could be able to push the play button when he feels it in time without the need of thinking that there is a latency.
I'm glad you liked the idea.

@mixxxbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: daschuer
Date: 2014-04-02T07:06:53Z


Now we have a quantization play. Can we mark this a fixed?

@mixxxbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: daschuer
Date: 2014-07-20T06:46:08Z


No responds = Yes :-)

@mixxxbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: ywwg
Date: 2014-07-23T13:13:14Z


yeah quantization play makes this irrelevant.

@mixxxbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Issue closed with status Fix Released.

@mixxxbot mixxxbot transferred this issue from another repository Aug 24, 2022
@mixxxbot mixxxbot added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Aug 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant