Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

more precise (internal) 'Date Added' timestamp #9625

Open
mixxxbot opened this issue Aug 23, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

more precise (internal) 'Date Added' timestamp #9625

mixxxbot opened this issue Aug 23, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@mixxxbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Reported by: ronso0
Date: 2019-04-07T09:08:43Z
Status: Confirmed
Importance: Wishlist
Launchpad Issue: lp1823515
Tags: library


please let's increase the precision of the timestamp when a file was scanned and added to the library.

Right now it shows yy-mm-dd hh:mm which is not sufficient in the following scenario:

  • add a few new albums to your library folder

  • start Mixxx, rescan library, sort by 'Date Added'
    = new tracks are grouped per folder (album), the track view is easy to read

  • alter the tracks in view (change rating, delete tracks, ..)

  • change to another library view, come back to Tracks
    = per-album grouping is screwed up
    = sort by 'Date Added' does NOT anymore group the tracks by folder (album)

A more precise timestamp would help here to easily restore the per-folder sorting.

@mixxxbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: ywwg
Date: 2019-04-08T15:26:49Z


agree with this. I would even be in favor of abusing the precise timing a little bit to our advantage: For tracks in a directory imported at the same time, set the timestamps and increase each file by one (one nanosecond or one nanosecond) for the alphabetical order of the files in the directory. That way sorting by date added would still maintain a predictable and useful order.

@mixxxbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: ronso0
Date: 2019-04-17T12:00:55Z


yeah, I also had the a-Z sorting in mind.
I thought this would happen automatically as files aren't recognised at light speed, are they :)

@mixxxbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: kek001
Date: 2019-04-27T09:20:28Z


I have also asked this earlier, this will help much, when add many albums.

@mixxxbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: naught101
Date: 2020-04-21T00:59:32Z


@owen Williams: It would be really nice if tracks with identical albums were inserted in reverse track-number order, rather than alphabetical. Reverse because this would allow sorting by newest-first date-added to also sort albums in the correct order.

Alphabetical is not necessarily useful, because even well named tracks are sometimes named e.g. artist - album 1 track.mp3, and this means that tracks 10-19 get inserted before track 2.

I would insert all files found at the same time alphabetically by:

  • artist, then
  • album, then
  • reverse disc number, then
  • reverse integer track number.
    And fallback on alphabetical by filename if none of those exist.

@mixxxbot mixxxbot transferred this issue from another repository Aug 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant