LMAX Disruptor compatibility

[mjiderhamn]

See #40. @dhuygu :

If I dont create a new class that extends ClassLoaderLeakPreventor an exception is thrown because of log4j2 and lmax disruptor library.

Feb 13, 2016 5:00:28 PM com.lmax.disruptor.FatalExceptionHandler
 handleEventException
SEVERE: Exception processing: 762 org.apache.logging.log4j.core.async.
RingBufferLogEvent@dd477f3 java.lang.InterruptedException at java.util.
concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.
reportInterruptAfterWait(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2014) at java.util.
concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2048) at com.lmax.disruptor.
BlockingWaitStrategy.waitFor(BlockingWaitStrategy.java:45) at com.lmax.
disruptor.ProcessingSequenceBarrier.waitFor(ProcessingSequenceBarrier.java:
55) at com.lmax.disruptor.BatchEventProcessor.run(BatchEventProcessor.java:
123) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor
.java:1142) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(
ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
 at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)​
 <13-Feb-2016 17:00:28 o'clock EET> <Error>
 <com.lmax.disruptor.FatalExceptionHandler> <BEA-000000> <Exception
 processing: 762
 org.apache.logging.log4j.core.async.RingBufferLogEvent@dd477f3 java.lang.
 InterruptedException at java.util.concurrent.locks.
 AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.reportInterruptAfterWait(
 AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2014) at java.util.concurrent.locks.
 AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(
 AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2048) at com.lmax.disruptor.
 BlockingWaitStrategy.waitFor(BlockingWaitStrategy.java:45) at com.lmax.
 disruptor.ProcessingSequenceBarrier.waitFor(ProcessingSequenceBarrier.java
 :55) at com.lmax.disruptor.BatchEventProcessor.run(BatchEventProcessor.
 java:123) Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace>