Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

lstm() function optional arguments #4

Closed
3 tasks
shiffman opened this issue Oct 23, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed
3 tasks

lstm() function optional arguments #4

shiffman opened this issue Oct 23, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@shiffman
Copy link
Member

The lstm() method should allow for options arguments:

  • No seed text provided, use random seed text from source text (how many chars?)
  • default temperature
  • default return length (or should this be required?)
cvalenzuela added a commit to cvalenzuela/ml5js-library that referenced this issue Jan 8, 2018
@cvalenzuela
refactor(source): update to match deeplearn 0.3.17 api. Added eslint …
0611169 
…and major refactors on classes

Update the source to match deeplearn 0.3.17 api. This commit also adds eslint using airbnb style,
refactors to use async/await whenever possible and static methods on classes. Also fixes some bugs.

closes ml5js#16, ml5js#6, ml5js#4
joeyklee pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 2, 2019
@cvalenzuela
refactor(source): update to match deeplearn 0.3.17 api. Added eslint …
41ab764 
…and major refactors on classes

Update the source to match deeplearn 0.3.17 api. This commit also adds eslint using airbnb style,
refactors to use async/await whenever possible and static methods on classes. Also fixes some bugs.

closes #16, #6, #4
joeyklee pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2019
@WenheLI
Merge pull request #4 from ml5js/development
1c009f7 
Update codebase
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@shiffman @cvalenzuela