Replace Window shell-escaping of databricks run command with bash escaping #10811
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🛠 DevTools 🛠
Install mlflow from this PR
Checkout with GitHub CLI
Related Issues/PRs
#8981 MLflow Project Runs Failing on Azure Databricks with "Invalid backend config JSON" ErrorWhat changes are proposed in this pull request?
Launching an MLflow projects run on databricks from Windows currently results in the run failing with a JSONDecodeError, as mentioned in the Issue linked above.
The reason for the crash is that when constructing the MLflow run command, that is later executed on databricks, a shell escaping is applied to the parameters. For this, the
quote()
function frommlflow.utils.string_utils
is used, which applies a Windows command line escaping on Windows machines:Because the command is then sent to databricks and executed on a Linux machine, the parameters cannot be parsed and the run fails.
Consequently, when assembling the mlflow run command for databricks, the bash escaping should always be used, regardless of the current OS.
How is this PR tested?
The
mlflow_run_cmd
variable inmlflow/mlflow/projects/databricks.py
Line 359 in 17dd903
Now it is:
mlflow run /databricks/mlflow/projects/d0500.... -c '{"_mlflow_local_backend_run_id": "4d0..."}'
In both commands I omitted the entrypoint and shortened the run ID and project ID. It is clear, that the upper command cannot be parsed by the bash on databricks. It is formatted for a Windows command line,
Does this PR require documentation update?
Release Notes
Is this a user-facing change?
What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?
Components
area/artifacts
: Artifact stores and artifact loggingarea/build
: Build and test infrastructure for MLflowarea/deployments
: MLflow Deployments client APIs, server, and third-party Deployments integrationsarea/docs
: MLflow documentation pagesarea/examples
: Example codearea/model-registry
: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registryarea/models
: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavorsarea/recipes
: Recipes, Recipe APIs, Recipe configs, Recipe Templatesarea/projects
: MLproject format, project running backendsarea/scoring
: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFsarea/server-infra
: MLflow Tracking server backendarea/tracking
: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologgingInterface
area/uiux
: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev serverarea/docker
: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Modelsarea/sqlalchemy
: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registryarea/windows
: Windows supportLanguage
language/r
: R APIs and clientslanguage/java
: Java APIs and clientslanguage/new
: Proposals for new client languagesIntegrations
integrations/azure
: Azure and Azure ML integrationsintegrations/sagemaker
: SageMaker integrationsintegrations/databricks
: Databricks integrationsHow should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:
rn/none
- No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" sectionrn/breaking-change
- The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" sectionrn/feature
- A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notesrn/bug-fix
- A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notesrn/documentation
- A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes