-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgraded fastai from v1 to v2 (>=2.4.1) #4715
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
@mlflow Thanks for the contribution! The DCO check failed. Please sign off your commits by following the instructions here: https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/runs/3377994134. See https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst#sign-your-work for more details. |
Signed-off-by: jinzhang21 <jin.zhang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: jinzhang21 <jin.zhang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: jinzhang21 <jin.zhang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: jinzhang21 <jin.zhang@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Harutaka Kawamura <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Harutaka Kawamura <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
tests/fastai/test_fastai_autolog.py
Outdated
@pytest.fixture(scope="session") | ||
def mnist_data(): | ||
mnist = untar_data(URLs.MNIST_TINY) | ||
return ImageDataLoaders.from_folder(mnist, num_workers=0) | ||
|
||
|
||
def fastai_visual_model(data, **kwargs): | ||
return cnn_learner(data, models.resnet18, normalize=False, **kwargs) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think training a ResNet model with the MNIST dataset takes a long time. Can we use a smaller dataset and a simpler model?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this run, pytest tests/fastai/test_fastai_autolog.py --large
took about 10 minutes:
https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/pull/4715/checks?check_run_id=3583140216
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't check every model there, but resnet18 has "only" 11M params. It appears to be the smallest model among those offered: https://fastai1.fast.ai/vision.models.html
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jinzhang21
I found a way to create a fine-tunable tabular model. Can I push some commits?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Go ahead!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jinzhang21 Puhsed a commit to update the code. Now it takes about 3 min. to run tests for fastai autologging: https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/pull/4715/checks?check_run_id=3605777911
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Super nice! Thanks for the change, Haru!
Signed-off-by: jinzhang21 <jin.zhang@databricks.com>
There's some problem with sklearn versioning, causing errors mentioned here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62322882/load-iris-got-an-unexpected-keyword-argument-as-frame. Not sure how it's related to this PR or a general problem. |
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
Deprecated fastai v1 and upgraded it to v2 with minimum version 2.4.1. Closes #4188
How is this patch tested?
Unit tests and integration tests.
Release Notes
Deprecated fastai v1 and upgraded it to v2 (minimum version 2.4.1).
Is this a user-facing change?
(Details in 1-2 sentences. You can just refer to another PR with a description if this PR is part of a larger change.)
What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?
Components
area/artifacts
: Artifact stores and artifact loggingarea/build
: Build and test infrastructure for MLflowarea/docs
: MLflow documentation pagesarea/examples
: Example codearea/model-registry
: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registryarea/models
: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavorsarea/projects
: MLproject format, project running backendsarea/scoring
: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFsarea/server-infra
: MLflow Tracking server backendarea/tracking
: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologgingInterface
area/uiux
: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev serverarea/docker
: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Modelsarea/sqlalchemy
: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registryarea/windows
: Windows supportLanguage
language/r
: R APIs and clientslanguage/java
: Java APIs and clientslanguage/new
: Proposals for new client languagesIntegrations
integrations/azure
: Azure and Azure ML integrationsintegrations/sagemaker
: SageMaker integrationsintegrations/databricks
: Databricks integrationsHow should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:
rn/breaking-change
- The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" sectionrn/none
- No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" sectionrn/feature
- A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notesrn/bug-fix
- A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notesrn/documentation
- A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes