Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgraded fastai from v1 to v2 (>=2.4.1) #4715

Merged
merged 28 commits into from
Sep 15, 2021
Merged

Upgraded fastai from v1 to v2 (>=2.4.1) #4715

merged 28 commits into from
Sep 15, 2021

Conversation

jinzhang21
Copy link
Collaborator

@jinzhang21 jinzhang21 commented Aug 20, 2021

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

Deprecated fastai v1 and upgraded it to v2 with minimum version 2.4.1. Closes #4188

How is this patch tested?

Unit tests and integration tests.

Release Notes

Deprecated fastai v1 and upgraded it to v2 (minimum version 2.4.1).

Is this a user-facing change?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Give a description of this change to be included in the release notes for MLflow users.

(Details in 1-2 sentences. You can just refer to another PR with a description if this PR is part of a larger change.)

What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?

Components

  • area/artifacts: Artifact stores and artifact logging
  • area/build: Build and test infrastructure for MLflow
  • area/docs: MLflow documentation pages
  • area/examples: Example code
  • area/model-registry: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registry
  • area/models: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavors
  • area/projects: MLproject format, project running backends
  • area/scoring: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFs
  • area/server-infra: MLflow Tracking server backend
  • area/tracking: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologging

Interface

  • area/uiux: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev server
  • area/docker: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Models
  • area/sqlalchemy: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registry
  • area/windows: Windows support

Language

  • language/r: R APIs and clients
  • language/java: Java APIs and clients
  • language/new: Proposals for new client languages

Integrations

  • integrations/azure: Azure and Azure ML integrations
  • integrations/sagemaker: SageMaker integrations
  • integrations/databricks: Databricks integrations

How should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:

  • rn/breaking-change - The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" section
  • rn/none - No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" section
  • rn/feature - A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/bug-fix - A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/documentation - A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes

Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lluis <l.salord.quetglas@gmail.com>
@github-actions
Copy link

@mlflow Thanks for the contribution! The DCO check failed. Please sign off your commits by following the instructions here: https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/runs/3377994134. See https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst#sign-your-work for more details.

@jinzhang21 jinzhang21 changed the title [Do not review] test PR Upgraded fastai from v1 to v2 (>=2.3.0) Sep 12, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/models MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavors rn/feature Mention under Features in Changelogs. labels Sep 12, 2021
Signed-off-by: jinzhang21 <jin.zhang@databricks.com>
@jinzhang21 jinzhang21 changed the title Upgraded fastai from v1 to v2 (>=2.3.0) Upgraded fastai from v1 to v2 (>=2.4.0) Sep 12, 2021
Signed-off-by: jinzhang21 <jin.zhang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: jinzhang21 <jin.zhang@databricks.com>
@jinzhang21 jinzhang21 changed the title Upgraded fastai from v1 to v2 (>=2.4.0) Upgraded fastai from v1 to v2 (>=2.4.1) Sep 12, 2021
Signed-off-by: jinzhang21 <jin.zhang@databricks.com>
mlflow/fastai/callback.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
mlflow/fastai/callback.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
jinzhang21 and others added 2 commits September 12, 2021 21:01
Co-authored-by: Harutaka Kawamura <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Harutaka Kawamura <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
examples/fastai/train.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 64 to 71
@pytest.fixture(scope="session")
def mnist_data():
mnist = untar_data(URLs.MNIST_TINY)
return ImageDataLoaders.from_folder(mnist, num_workers=0)


def fastai_visual_model(data, **kwargs):
return cnn_learner(data, models.resnet18, normalize=False, **kwargs)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think training a ResNet model with the MNIST dataset takes a long time. Can we use a smaller dataset and a simpler model?

Copy link
Member

@harupy harupy Sep 13, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In this run, pytest tests/fastai/test_fastai_autolog.py --large took about 10 minutes:
https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/pull/4715/checks?check_run_id=3583140216

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't check every model there, but resnet18 has "only" 11M params. It appears to be the smallest model among those offered: https://fastai1.fast.ai/vision.models.html

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jinzhang21
I found a way to create a fine-tunable tabular model. Can I push some commits?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Go ahead!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jinzhang21 Puhsed a commit to update the code. Now it takes about 3 min. to run tests for fastai autologging: https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/pull/4715/checks?check_run_id=3605777911

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Super nice! Thanks for the change, Haru!

Signed-off-by: jinzhang21 <jin.zhang@databricks.com>
@jinzhang21
Copy link
Collaborator Author

There's some problem with sklearn versioning, causing errors mentioned here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62322882/load-iris-got-an-unexpected-keyword-argument-as-frame. Not sure how it's related to this PR or a general problem.

jinzhang21 and others added 3 commits September 13, 2021 20:01
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@harupy harupy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@harupy harupy merged commit acdf976 into master Sep 15, 2021
@harupy harupy deleted the fastai branch April 9, 2024 07:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/models MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavors rn/feature Mention under Features in Changelogs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants