-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix contour plot on run comparison page #4940
Conversation
const maybeRenderPlot = () => { | ||
if (xsSorted.length < 2 || ysSorted.length < 2) { | ||
return ( | ||
<div>X or Y axis doesn't have enough unique data points to draw the contour plot</div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<div>X or Y axis doesn't have enough unique data points to draw the contour plot</div> | |
<div>The contour plot requires at least two unique data points on the X and Y axes.</div> |
Does this sound clearer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about splitting the if-clause into 2 to improve the error message to indicate which axis it is?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the suggestion! Sounds good so the implementation should look like this, right?
<div>X or Y axis doesn't have enough unique data points to draw the contour plot</div> | |
const invalidAxes = []; | |
if (xsSorted.length < 2) {invalidAxes.push("X")} | |
if (ysSorted.length < 2) {invalidAxes.push("Y")} | |
if (invalidAxes.length > 0) { | |
const message = ( | |
invalidAxes.length > 1 ? | |
`The ${invalidAxes.join("and")} axes don't` : | |
`The ${invalidAxes[0]} axis doesn't` : | |
) | |
return <div>{`${message}` enough data points to render the contour plot.}</div> | |
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice!
); | ||
} | ||
|
||
return ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Which lines in this moved function is changed? Also why makes it a LazyPlot?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the comment. I just added the if clause right above to avoid attempting to render the plot with invalid data.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also why makes it a LazyPlot?
It's because the original implementation uses LazyPlot
?
const maybeRenderPlot = () => { | ||
if (xsSorted.length < 2 || ysSorted.length < 2) { | ||
return ( | ||
<div>X or Y axis doesn't have enough unique data points to draw the contour plot</div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about splitting the if-clause into 2 to improve the error message to indicate which axis it is?
Signed-off-by: harupy <17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: harupy 17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
How is this patch tested?
Before (master branch)
contour-issue-before.mov
p1
,p2
, andm1
, but fails becausep1
has a single unique value: 0 (see the error message on the console). The contour plot seems to require at least two data points on each axis.scattergl
(on this line). The plot gets drawn successfully withscatter
. I haven't taken a look at the internal implementation of plotly, but it looks like usingscattergl
changes how plotly updates the plot state.After
contour-issue-after.mov
Code to generate test data
Release Notes
Is this a user-facing change?
(Details in 1-2 sentences. You can just refer to another PR with a description if this PR is part of a larger change.)
What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?
Components
area/artifacts
: Artifact stores and artifact loggingarea/build
: Build and test infrastructure for MLflowarea/docs
: MLflow documentation pagesarea/examples
: Example codearea/model-registry
: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registryarea/models
: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavorsarea/projects
: MLproject format, project running backendsarea/scoring
: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFsarea/server-infra
: MLflow Tracking server backendarea/tracking
: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologgingInterface
area/uiux
: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev serverarea/docker
: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Modelsarea/sqlalchemy
: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registryarea/windows
: Windows supportLanguage
language/r
: R APIs and clientslanguage/java
: Java APIs and clientslanguage/new
: Proposals for new client languagesIntegrations
integrations/azure
: Azure and Azure ML integrationsintegrations/sagemaker
: SageMaker integrationsintegrations/databricks
: Databricks integrationsHow should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:
rn/breaking-change
- The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" sectionrn/none
- No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" sectionrn/feature
- A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notesrn/bug-fix
- A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notesrn/documentation
- A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes