Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a pre-commit hook for running black and pylint #5019

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 8, 2021

Conversation

harupy
Copy link
Member

@harupy harupy commented Nov 8, 2021

Signed-off-by: harupy hkawamura0130@gmail.com

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

Add a pre-commit hook for running black and pylint to avoid re-running CI just to fix lint errors.

How is this patch tested?

  • Create a file that contains a lint error.
  • Make a commit to ensure the pre-commit hook aborts it.
% git diff
diff --git a/dev/show_package_release_dates.py b/dev/show_package_release_dates.py
index 76b653792..44792ba9c 100644
--- a/dev/show_package_release_dates.py
+++ b/dev/show_package_release_dates.py
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import traceback
 
 
 def get_distributions():
-    res = subprocess.run(["pip", "list"], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, check=True)
+    res = subprocess.run(["pip", "list"], stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
     pip_list_stdout = res.stdout.decode("utf-8")
     # `pip_list_stdout` looks like this:
     # ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                                                                                              
% git add .
                                                                                              
% git commit --signoff -m test
+ git diff --cached --name-only
+ grep \.py$
+ diff=dev/show_package_release_dates.py
+ [ ! -z dev/show_package_release_dates.py ]
+ black --check dev/show_package_release_dates.py
All done! ✨ 🍰 ✨
1 file would be left unchanged.
+ pylint dev/show_package_release_dates.py
************* Module show_package_release_dates
dev/show_package_release_dates.py:9:10: W1510: Using subprocess.run without explicitly set `check` is not recommended. (subprocess-run-check)

------------------------------------------------------------------
Your code has been rated at 9.76/10 (previous run: 9.76/10, +0.00)

Release Notes

Is this a user-facing change?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Give a description of this change to be included in the release notes for MLflow users.

(Details in 1-2 sentences. You can just refer to another PR with a description if this PR is part of a larger change.)

What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?

Components

  • area/artifacts: Artifact stores and artifact logging
  • area/build: Build and test infrastructure for MLflow
  • area/docs: MLflow documentation pages
  • area/examples: Example code
  • area/model-registry: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registry
  • area/models: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavors
  • area/projects: MLproject format, project running backends
  • area/scoring: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFs
  • area/server-infra: MLflow Tracking server backend
  • area/tracking: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologging

Interface

  • area/uiux: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev server
  • area/docker: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Models
  • area/sqlalchemy: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registry
  • area/windows: Windows support

Language

  • language/r: R APIs and clients
  • language/java: Java APIs and clients
  • language/new: Proposals for new client languages

Integrations

  • integrations/azure: Azure and Azure ML integrations
  • integrations/sagemaker: SageMaker integrations
  • integrations/databricks: Databricks integrations

How should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:

  • rn/breaking-change - The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" section
  • rn/none - No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" section
  • rn/feature - A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/bug-fix - A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/documentation - A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes

Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the rn/none List under Small Changes in Changelogs. label Nov 8, 2021

if [ ! -z "$diff" ]; then
black --check $diff
pylint $diff
Copy link
Member Author

@harupy harupy Nov 8, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only check the changed files to save the execution time.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This hook can be enabled via:

git config core.hooksPath hooks

Copy link
Collaborator

@liangz1 liangz1 Nov 8, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be nice to also update https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst#common-prerequisites-and-dependencies

For convenience, we provide a pre-commit git hook that validates that commits are signed-off.

to

For convenience, we provide a pre-commit git hook that validates that commits are signed-off, auto-formats the code, and runs pylint.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good!

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated!

Copy link
Collaborator

@liangz1 liangz1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only one question about the file name:
Currently, the two files in hooks/ are named as pre-commit and prepare-commit-msg, which are not directly reflecting their functions. Shall we rename them to autoformat-and-check-lint and check-sign-off? Or something similar?

@harupy
Copy link
Member Author

harupy commented Nov 8, 2021

Only one question about the file name:
Currently, the two files in hooks/ are named as pre-commit and prepare-commit-msg, which are not directly reflecting their functions. Shall we rename them to autoformat-and-check-lint and check-sign-off? Or something similar?

@liangz1

Good point, but pre-commit and prepare-commit-msg are special file names so we can't change them.

Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
@harupy harupy requested a review from liangz1 November 8, 2021 10:55
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@liangz1 liangz1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks!

@harupy harupy merged commit 6af26f8 into mlflow:master Nov 8, 2021
@harupy harupy deleted the add-pre-commit-hook branch November 8, 2021 15:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rn/none List under Small Changes in Changelogs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants