New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Density Estimation Tree made sparse-enabled #802
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
28 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
84990cb
- Mac gitignore changes.
thejonan dc2a8e8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'
thejonan 5b13881
- DTree class templated.
thejonan 8b4c907
- First successfull builtd.
thejonan 0b58fd9
- DET changes propagated to tests.
thejonan 47bf92f
- DET templating ready and tests passing.
thejonan e4a9be0
- More sparse-matrix migration steps.
thejonan 3547fff
- First successfull SpMat build.
thejonan 11c4b0a
- Sparse DTree finally working.
thejonan 4083784
- All DET sparsification works.
thejonan 44fd0c0
- OMP test line removed.
thejonan 525c617
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'
thejonan aa2ad99
- DTree class templated.
thejonan 37a9e50
- First successfull builtd.
thejonan f1d4467
- DET changes propagated to tests.
thejonan 45ff5ba
- DET templating ready and tests passing.
thejonan 9bee58e
- More sparse-matrix migration steps.
thejonan 6b3ae6c
- First successfull SpMat build.
thejonan dc8d9b1
- Sparse DTree finally working.
thejonan 1fee500
- All DET sparsification works.
thejonan 0d0e387
- OMP test line removed.
thejonan 98cadd8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/feature/det_sparse' into feature…
thejonan 24f6d8c
- Fixed openmp declarations.
thejonan 4514e4c
- Sparse matrix speed-ups.
thejonan 8d26bb6
- Fix of sparse iteration
thejonan 50fa931
- Rowback to faster sparse iteration.
thejonan a60ae8a
- Fixes, based on PR's comments.
thejonan 10812ca
- Template fixes for ExtractSplits.
thejonan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't we include
dt_utils.hpp
anddt_utils_impl.hpp
too? I overlooked this in my review :)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've decided to remove them, because I'm not sure they should actually be part of the library itself. Aren't they mostly related to the command-line tool?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, they actually can be used for the library---they contain some cross-validation code and the
Trainer()
method which is used for producing a cross-validated tree. To be honest I would prefer if those were refactored into the class constructor itself, since they are not very "mlpack-ish", but either way they are something that a user may want to use so we should leave them in.