Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MRG: Add check for comps in inv #5610

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2018
Merged

MRG: Add check for comps in inv #5610

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2018

Conversation

larsoner
Copy link
Member

This PR adds checking that compensation grade of data matches that of forward. If it's not the case, it's probably a (fairly easily correctable) error on the part of the user.

@bloyl do you agree?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 15, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #5610 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5610      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.44%   88.44%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         363      363              
  Lines       68214    68228      +14     
  Branches    11526    11527       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        60332    60344      +12     
- Misses       5041     5043       +2     
  Partials     2841     2841

@bloyl
Copy link
Contributor

bloyl commented Oct 15, 2018

+1 LGTM

@larsoner
Copy link
Member Author

@agramfort okay for you?

@agramfort
Copy link
Member

yes ok !

@larsoner larsoner merged commit 6689111 into mne-tools:master Oct 17, 2018
@larsoner
Copy link
Member Author

In it goes then, @bloyl feel free to rebase your PR to make sure everything still works there

@larsoner larsoner deleted the comps branch October 17, 2018 15:39
@bloyl
Copy link
Contributor

bloyl commented Oct 17, 2018

that was already merged. so we should be ok.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants