-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Private Registry and Read Only Users #7761
Labels
exp/expert
kind/enhancement
Enhancements are not bugs or new features but can improve usability or performance.
Comments
Put otherwise: a v1 push that fails for authentication denied does not output a meaningful message to the user. |
jessfraz
added
exp/expert
kind/feature
Functionality or other elements that the project doesn't currently have. Features are new and shiny
and removed
exp/expert
labels
Feb 25, 2015
dmp42
added
exp/expert
kind/enhancement
Enhancements are not bugs or new features but can improve usability or performance.
and removed
kind/feature
Functionality or other elements that the project doesn't currently have. Features are new and shiny
labels
Feb 25, 2015
related / dup of #11016? |
Yes, this is the same behavior that I reported with #11016. |
@jfrazelle looks like dup, but perhaps you can decide. Also one is marked "black belt" and the other "white belt", which would be strange if they're indeed dup. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
exp/expert
kind/enhancement
Enhancements are not bugs or new features but can improve usability or performance.
I have a private registry setup with docker-registry 0.7.3. I am testing with Docker 1.2.0. We use basic auth to keep it private for internal use. However, we also wanted to have read-only access for some of our automated processes. I did this by creating the following Apache 2.4 configuration.
In general, this works. Read/Write users can upload and pull images and our read-only user
docker
can pull and not push.However, if someone does try a push operation authenticated as the
docker
user then the push command suddenly exists with an error code of 1.Running the docker daemon in debug mode it clearly reports a 401 error from the server, but this never makes its way to a useful error message for the client. It would be great if the client would handle this with an appropriate error message.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: