Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cats integration #107

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
May 12, 2019
Merged

Cats integration #107

merged 11 commits into from
May 12, 2019

Conversation

ultrasecreth
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@Krever Krever left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great.
Three things to consider:

  1. Do we want to put it in docs? Might make it easier to discover even that the feature itself is trivial and self explanatory.
  2. Alternative syntax could be shouldReturnPure and shouldReturnFailed but Im not sure if its any better. I'm happy with the current one but this is something to consider.
  3. Maybe we could post link to the PR in cats gitter room and ask for feedback there? There might be some insightful comments from the cats user base.

@ultrasecreth
Copy link
Member Author

  1. Yes, the PR is not completed yet, but didn't wanna write the docs before having the API reviewed ;)
  2. We can add as many alternatives as needed, so that's not a problem
  3. Good idea!

@ultrasecreth ultrasecreth merged commit bde072d into release/1.x May 12, 2019
@ultrasecreth ultrasecreth deleted the cats-integration branch May 12, 2019 18:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants