Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update toolchain to nightly 2023-08-04 #2661

Merged

Conversation

remi-delmas-3000
Copy link
Contributor

@remi-delmas-3000 remi-delmas-3000 commented Aug 4, 2023

Description of changes:

bump toolchain to nightly-2023-08-04

Call-outs:

Testing:

CI tests are passing. Built and tested on Apple M1.

Checklist

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made
  • Methods or procedures are documented
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.

@remi-delmas-3000 remi-delmas-3000 added the [C] Internal Tracks some internal work. I.e.: Users should not be affected. label Aug 4, 2023
@remi-delmas-3000 remi-delmas-3000 changed the title Update toolchain to nightly 2023-08-03 Update toolchain to nightly 2023-08-04 Aug 4, 2023
@remi-delmas-3000 remi-delmas-3000 added Z-BenchCI Tag a PR to run benchmark CI and removed [C] Internal Tracks some internal work. I.e.: Users should not be affected. labels Aug 4, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@celinval celinval left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks good. I was just wondering if there's any specific reason why you updated our dependencies. If there's no reason, can you please revert those changes and push a separate PR?

BTW, thanks for fixing the documentation warnings. We should probably enforce no warnings in our CI but not here.

Thanks again!

Cargo.lock Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@remi-delmas-3000
Copy link
Contributor Author

It looks good. I was just wondering if there's any specific reason why you updated our dependencies. If there's no reason, can you please revert those changes and push a separate PR?

BTW, thanks for fixing the documentation warnings. We should probably enforce no warnings in our CI but not here.

Thanks again!

there's a clang-format-14 reports formatting error on the vec.c stub, but I could not reproduce it locally so I could not fix.

Copy link
Contributor

@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @remi-delmas-3000 !

here's a clang-format-14 reports formatting error on the vec.c stub, but I could not reproduce it locally so I could not fix.

Looks like it's been there for a while (seen it in other PRs) and our workflow is set to continue on errors from clang-format.

@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2023 15:44
@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws requested a review from a team as a code owner August 8, 2023 15:44
@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws enabled auto-merge (squash) August 8, 2023 15:45
@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws merged commit 63f513f into model-checking:main Aug 8, 2023
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Z-BenchCI Tag a PR to run benchmark CI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants