Clock constructor dimensionality.

[HansOlsson]

Closes #2177

[henrikt-ma]

Requesting change, since this doesn't sounds exactly like what I think was said in the meeting.

[HansOlsson]

I have now dropped 'in a similar way'; I couldn't figure out how to easily state that there are no clocks in function - so I think it can wait.

[henrikt-ma]

Requesting change, since I don't think the intention was to allow operators to take arrays of expressions.

[henrikt-ma]

Well, at least this now meets my expectations based on my understanding of the phone meeting decision, so I leave my approval.

As my mentions of @sjoelund hasn't triggered a response from him yet, I now made a last attempt to also get his approval by requesting his review. Maybe we can wait a day before merging?

[sjoelund]

I think the comment from @eshmoylova makes sense. Perhaps "These functions are not callable in functions and functions may not contain Clock variables".
I don't have time to look at this in detail though.

[henrikt-ma]

I think the comment from @eshmoylova makes sense. Perhaps "These functions are not callable in functions and functions may not contain Clock variables".
I don't have time to look at this in detail though.

It's a valid restriction to make, but not in this section. Right after the definition of Clock variable, for instance, would be a possible place to add it.

[HansOlsson]

I think the comment from @eshmoylova makes sense. Perhaps "These functions are not callable in functions and functions may not contain Clock variables".
I don't have time to look at this in detail though.

It's a valid restriction to make, but not in this section. Right after the definition of Clock variable, for instance, would be a possible place to add it.

Or in function chapter as suggested by @eshmoylova - I added that.

[henrikt-ma]

Looks good, and I think it's ready to be merged now.