Treat 'connect' like the keyword it is in listings #2785
Conversation
|
Right, this shouldn't be fixed for just
Having more than one color for different categories of keywords sounds like a good idea, if we can only come up with enough colors that also work well in inline listings. One of the challenges I see here is the coloring of The real problem I'd like to address with this PR is that there are colors that are used by both keywords and non-keywords. I find it impossible to argue that readers understand that coloring has nothing to do with keyword status. |
|
Proposal: connect and der same color as non-keywords as assert, but bold-face. |
|
Small update regarding work in progress: The fonts currently used for the pdfLaTeX build doesn't distinguish between medium weight and boldface, which is a bit of a regression from the 3.4 document, and meaning that the discussion in this issue so far has been partly hypothetical (there is a different in font weight in the LaTeXML build). Because of this, I'm currently trying to find a better source code font for the pdfLaTeX build. Once I've found something, I plan to switch the font as part of this PR, so that the choice of font can be discussed together with how different font weights are used for syntax highlighting. |
This way, it becomes possible to both modify the default size of \ttfamily itself, and then possibly override this with \smallifpdf. For the current teletype font we don't need this, but it has turned out to be useful in the evaluation of some other candidates.
Changes include: - Make sure only actual Modelica keywords are highlighted as such. - Highlight fixed strings in same way as Modelica keywords. - Make BNF syntactical constructs stand out by having upright shape (using italics for production rule names). That production rule names are set in italics will also make it easier to tell the difference between a grammar listing and a Modelica listing when reading the document.
|
I am a aware of the CI failure, and it should be fixed within the next few days. That aside, I consider this ready for another round of feedback. |
No description provided.