Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gather annotations for functions #2922

Merged

Conversation

henrikt-ma
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #2895.

This is still work in progress, reflected by the Draft state – the PR is initiated just to show intention of having something ready for the upcoming phone meeting.

@henrikt-ma henrikt-ma force-pushed the cleanup/gather-function-annotations branch from 2d40ca1 to 891f414 Compare April 29, 2021 21:29
@henrikt-ma
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Considering that the goal is to have something ready for the upcoming phone meeting, there is no time for polishing this more before collecting feed-back. Removing Draft state.

@henrikt-ma henrikt-ma marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2021 23:09
@henrikt-ma henrikt-ma mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2021
@henrikt-ma
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Dear reviewers, as there were no comments yet I took the opportunity to improve this PR further by matching the styles of how we present the annotations in the Functions chapter. Still seeking reviews, so that we can move forward on this.

chapters/functions.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@HansOlsson HansOlsson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good except for the minor change.

Co-authored-by: Hans Olsson <HansOlsson@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@HansOlsson HansOlsson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok

@HansOlsson
Copy link
Collaborator

HansOlsson commented May 26, 2021

Ok

Except for the conflict that should now be resolved.

Copy link
Member

@eshmoylova eshmoylova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.


\begin{annotationdefinition}[Inline]
\begin{annotationdefinition}[experiment]
% henrikt-ma 2021-04: Seems strange to allow 'experiment' completely without list of options -- what would it mean?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we open a ticket about it?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good suggestion, but it seems like this comment was lost when the PR was closed. Opened #2985.

@HansOlsson HansOlsson merged commit 1a8e363 into modelica:master May 26, 2021
@henrikt-ma henrikt-ma deleted the cleanup/gather-function-annotations branch May 28, 2021 05:01
@HansOlsson HansOlsson added the M36 For pull requests merged into Modelica 3.6 label Jul 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
M36 For pull requests merged into Modelica 3.6
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Gather annotations for functions with impact on symbolic processing
3 participants