Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update comments about LaTeXML issues that are now fixed on 'master' #2983

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2021
Merged

Update comments about LaTeXML issues that are now fixed on 'master' #2983

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions preamble.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -352,9 +352,9 @@
\newcommand{\Crefnameref}[1]{\Cref{#1}~\emph{\nameref*{#1}}}
\else
% Don't use \nameref* while waiting for LaTeXML issue to get fixed:
% - https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML/issues/1348
% - https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML/issues/1348 -- fixed on 'master'
% At the same time, there are also problems with the normal \nameref:
% - https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML/issues/1350
% - https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML/issues/1350 -- fixed on 'master'
% Since the excessive output of \nameref only replaces the need for \cref for some labels,
% we can't rely on just \nameref, meaning we can't use it at all.
\let\crefnameref\cref
Expand Down