Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing Modifications (MCP-0009) #3167

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Nov 14, 2022
Merged

Removing Modifications (MCP-0009) #3167

merged 22 commits into from
Nov 14, 2022

Conversation

qlambert-pro
Copy link
Collaborator

Creating the pull request to start discussions

HansOlsson and others added 12 commits March 17, 2021 11:39
Add from old svn-server
Clarified.
Added experience in Dymola.
Added user experience
As discussed at the meeting.
Update README.md for balanced models.
Clarified experience.
Removed empty-variant. The meeting otherwise found it ok.
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@qlambert-pro qlambert-pro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So I can't formally approve the PR because I created it. But it looks good to me.

chapters/inheritance.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
chapters/inheritance.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
chapters/inheritance.tex Show resolved Hide resolved
chapters/inheritance.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
chapters/inheritance.tex Show resolved Hide resolved
chapters/inheritance.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Elena Shmoylova <eshmoylova@users.noreply.github.com>
@henrikt-ma henrikt-ma changed the title Mcp/0009 Removing Modifications (MCP-0009) May 17, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@HansOlsson HansOlsson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems ok to me.
(Yes, I actually made the changes - so a bit weird; but reverse of qlambert - so one approval from us two should count).

@HansOlsson HansOlsson added the MCP Generic MCP label (prefer specific MCP label for grouping of issues belonging to the same MCP) label May 23, 2022
@perost
Copy link
Collaborator

perost commented Jun 15, 2022

Seems ok to me too. We haven't implemented it in OpenModelica yet, but it looks fairly straight-forward and I don't really see any issues.

@HansOlsson HansOlsson self-requested a review September 14, 2022 13:27
Copy link
Collaborator

@HansOlsson HansOlsson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Expanding on my previous approval.
I didn't actually author the MCP - I just moved it forward; and converted it to markdown.

The experience with the proposal is that it is a small addition, easy to implement, and easy to understand. The implementation effort was less than two days - including error cases; and handling the various cases in the GUI. The only minor issue is that some attributes are connected (so breaking start while keeping fixed=true), but the same applies in other cases and a tool can help reduce that problem - and I don't see how to easily fix it.

@HansOlsson
Copy link
Collaborator

Collection of reviews:

  • Hans Olsson: "The experience with the proposal is that it is a small addition, easy to implement, and easy to understand. The implementation effort was less than two days - including error cases; and handling the various cases in the GUI. The only minor issue is that some attributes are connected (so breaking start while keeping fixed=true), but the same applies in other cases and a tool can help reduce that problem - and I don't see how to easily fix it." Removing Modifications (MCP-0009) #3167 (review)_
  • Quentin Lambert: "So I can't formally approve the PR because I created it. But it looks good to me."; Removing Modifications (MCP-0009) #3167 (review)_
  • Per Öst: "Seems ok to me too. We haven't implemented it in OpenModelica yet, but it looks fairly straight-forward and I don't really see any issues." Removing Modifications (MCP-0009) #3167 (comment)_

Some remaining issue that seems to be resolved, and as soon as that is confirmed as resolved we can move forward.

chapters/inheritance.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
chapters/inheritance.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
HansOlsson and others added 2 commits September 29, 2022 15:52
Co-authored-by: Elena Shmoylova <eshmoylova@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Elena Shmoylova <eshmoylova@users.noreply.github.com>
@HansOlsson HansOlsson added this to the MCP-2-UnderEvaluation milestone Sep 30, 2022
@HansOlsson HansOlsson merged commit ae5f432 into master Nov 14, 2022
@HansOlsson HansOlsson deleted the MCP/0009 branch November 14, 2022 21:47
@HansOlsson HansOlsson added the M36 For pull requests merged into Modelica 3.6 label Jul 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
M36 For pull requests merged into Modelica 3.6 MCP Generic MCP label (prefer specific MCP label for grouping of issues belonging to the same MCP)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants