You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not the biggest problem in the world, but...
I found an inconsistency in Electrical.QuasiStationary.Basic models.
Namely, the inductance value of the inductor is much smaller than the other values in similar components (resistor, capacitor, conductor.)
In the Inductor I read:
Text(extent={{150,-50},{-150,-80}}, textString="L=%L"),
while in the Resistor, Capacitor, Conductor I read:
Text(extent={{150,-40},{-150,-80}}, textString="R=%R_ref"),
Text(extent={{150,-40},{-150,-80}}, textString="C=%C"),
Text(extent={{150,-40},{-148,-80}}, textString="G=%G_ref"),
So the fix is simple: just change -50 into -40 in the Inductor.
I suppose it is also wise to change -148 into -150 in the conductor
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
beutlich
added a commit
to beutlich/ModelicaStandardLibrary
that referenced
this issue
Sep 5, 2019
Not the biggest problem in the world, but...
I found an inconsistency in Electrical.QuasiStationary.Basic models.
Namely, the inductance value of the inductor is much smaller than the other values in similar components (resistor, capacitor, conductor.)
In the Inductor I read:
Text(extent={{150,-50},{-150,-80}}, textString="L=%L"),
while in the Resistor, Capacitor, Conductor I read:
Text(extent={{150,-40},{-150,-80}}, textString="R=%R_ref"),
Text(extent={{150,-40},{-150,-80}}, textString="C=%C"),
Text(extent={{150,-40},{-148,-80}}, textString="G=%G_ref"),
So the fix is simple: just change -50 into -40 in the Inductor.
I suppose it is also wise to change -148 into -150 in the conductor
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: