-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New obsoleted models added but why? #769
Comments
Comment by majetta on 23 Jul 2012 09:11 UTC
These models are improvements of the formerly BJT and ModelcardBJT models. Since we are not allowed to remove the old models because of backwards compatibility, we renamed the old ones to
|
Comment by otter on 23 Jul 2012 09:28 UTC
|
Comment by majetta on 23 Jul 2012 09:49 UTC
and did not change the "old" names. This was done in revision 24c2072. |
Comment by dietmarw on 23 Jul 2012 10:23 UTC |
Comment by dietmarw on 23 Jul 2012 10:35 UTC |
Comment by majetta on 24 Jul 2012 10:13 UTC |
Comment by dietmarw on 24 Jul 2012 10:43 UTC Also it looks like there was some confusion because I haven't checked any further but there might be more such ill dependencies that need fixing and since you got a better grasp on the structure I'll leave that to you. In principle, nothing in the library itself should use any obsoleted classes any longer, unless they are marked as obsoleted themselves. And don't forget to fix the icons (see #782). |
Comment by majetta on 30 Jul 2012 14:34 UTC |
Comment by dietmarw on 31 Jul 2012 06:40 UTC |
Comment by majetta on 31 Jul 2012 07:09 UTC |
Comment by dietmarw on 2 Aug 2012 13:48 UTC |
Modified by majetta on 5 Apr 2013 12:12 UTC |
Changelog modified by majetta on 5 Apr 2013 12:12 UTC |
Modified by majetta on 10 Apr 2013 11:28 UTC |
Changelog modified by majetta on 10 Apr 2013 11:28 UTC |
Reported by dietmarw on 29 Jun 2012 16:01 UTC
In e04efb6 two models were added to the
Spice3
library:Spice3.Internal.BJT_obsolete
Spice3.Internal.ModelicardBJT_obsolete
I'm not sure why one would add a new obsoleted class that at the same time recommends using a different class. This just doesn't make any sense and should be corrected (as should be the newly added use of those classes).
Migrated-From: https://trac.modelica.org/Modelica/ticket/769
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: