-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarified PolyPhasePolygon #3237
Conversation
…s enhanced example
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CI fails due to invalid package.order: https://travis-ci.org/modelica/ModelicaStandardLibrary/builds/616352164#L212-L215
@beutlich: |
Finally resolved the type "PolyPhaseRectifier" vs. "PolyphaseRectifier". |
@AHaumer One thing I wondered is the naming of |
@dietmarw regarding "delta" vs. "polygon": You're right, polygon is the more general term, although people working on 3 phase systems are used to delta. |
@AHaumer You misunderstood. I did not mean the "Delta" but the "Multi". So to be consistent it should probably be "PolyDelta"? |
@dietmarw |
…f basic subsystems
It's fine by me but just wanted to make sure we overlooking this and then can not change the name until the next conversion script which might or might not be a while away. You could argue that we are also talking about "multiple" phase system. Still the correct term (as we found out) is poly-phase. So just wanted to make sure that MultiDelta is the correct term. |
Modelica/Electrical/Polyphase/Examples/Utilities/PolyphaseRectifierData.mo
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…enable=false))
@dietmarw : done ( |
…aStandardLibrary into PolyPhasePolygon
Otherwise the images are not loaded correctly on a Linux system
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tested the examples with a different number of phases and everything seems to work
I implemented a clarification about the polyphase polygon connection.
For m>3 phases there exist alternatives for the polygon,
e.g. compare m=3, m=6=2x3, m=5 and m=7: