Fix (and rename) parameters of Modelica.Electrical.Digital.Examples.Utilities.DFF

[beutlich]

Closes #4174.

Note, that I renamed the two parameters to match the identifiers of the underlying classes. No conversion script is needed for such example components.

[henrikt-ma]

While I often think that final parameter propagations are good, I think someone like an MSL sub-library officer is needed to know whether it is the right thing to do here.

[beutlich]

While I often think that final parameter propagations are good, I think someone like an MSL sub-library officer is needed to know whether it is the right thing to do here.

Someone needs to take over, because the original library officers of Electrical.Digital are no loger active.

[hubertus65]

Yes, that is exactly the problem that the former library officers are no longer active. Here is why I think that adding the finals is the correct solution: I think that without it, it's possible and actually quite easy to get internally inconcistent models.

[henrikt-ma]

Yes, that is exactly the problem that the former library officers are no longer active.

Right. This is a reminder of one of the unavoidable problems we run into due the monolithic MSL architecture.

[hubertus65]

People leaving due to job change/ retirement has nothing to do with that. We have exactly per-sublibrary officers, so arguably this is the only part of MSL that is not monolithic in terms of practice.

[GallLeo]

MAP-LIB group during monthly meeting:
Just formal issue of no library officer.
Proposal seems fine.