Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid using synchronize_labels for combine function #7299

Closed
anmyachev opened this issue Jun 4, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7300
Closed

Avoid using synchronize_labels for combine function #7299

anmyachev opened this issue Jun 4, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7300
Assignees
Labels
Performance 🚀 Performance related issues and pull requests.

Comments

@anmyachev
Copy link
Collaborator

anmyachev commented Jun 4, 2024

Index assignment is a very fast operation, the main time is spent on serialization/deserialization. The idea is to combine index assignment with partition combination operation in one remote kernel.

@anmyachev anmyachev added the Performance 🚀 Performance related issues and pull requests. label Jun 4, 2024
@anmyachev anmyachev self-assigned this Jun 4, 2024
anmyachev added a commit to anmyachev/modin that referenced this issue Jun 4, 2024
…nchronize_labels' for 'combine' function

Signed-off-by: Anatoly Myachev <anatoly.myachev@intel.com>
@anmyachev anmyachev changed the title Consider using lazy_metadata_decorator instead of synchronize_labels for the combine function Avoid using synchronize_labels for combine function Jun 6, 2024
anmyachev added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 7, 2024
…7300)

Signed-off-by: Anatoly Myachev <anatoly.myachev@intel.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Performance 🚀 Performance related issues and pull requests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant