Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Taswira as a general purpose spatial+non-spatial visualization tool #35

Open
abhineet97 opened this issue Aug 27, 2020 · 1 comment
Open
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@abhineet97
Copy link
Collaborator

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
At the moment Taswira is able to visualize only GCBM output. It has the table names, raster patterns and other things hard-coded into it for the sole purpose of visualizing GCBM output. It would exponentially increase the utility of Taswira if it were able to visualize any arbitrary combinations of spatial and non-spatial data.

Describe the solution you'd like
I think that if we are somehow able to offload the task of specifying table names, column name, raster patterns, SQL queries, etc to the user then we can solve this problem.

@abhineet97 abhineet97 added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 27, 2020
@abhineet97 abhineet97 changed the title Taswira as general purpose tool for visualising arbitrary combinations of spatial and non-spatial data Taswira as a general purpose tool for visualising arbitrary combinations of spatial and non-spatial data Aug 27, 2020
@abhineet97 abhineet97 changed the title Taswira as a general purpose tool for visualising arbitrary combinations of spatial and non-spatial data Taswira as a general purpose spatial+non-spatial visualization tool Aug 27, 2020
@kaskou
Copy link
Collaborator

kaskou commented Sep 24, 2020

this feature would be of great use and will be useful for the people who are using flint can visualise the outputs easily rather than building their own tool

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants