Fix to Arabic week number parsings. #1398
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…is the week of January 1st
|
Good catch, thank you! |
ichernev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2014
Fix Arabic-like week number parsing @changelog @section bugfix
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In Arabic week numbering (week starts on Saturday, 1st week contains January 1st) the local week numbering formatting is correct (2013-12-28 formatted as gggg ww d becomes 2014 1 6), the parsing however is shifting the weeks by one. Parsing moment('2014 1 6', 'gggg w d') returns the January 4th 2014.
Fixes the issue #1397