Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

boost portable binary archive: account for API difference between 1.58 & 1.59 #1483

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2016

Conversation

kenshi84
Copy link
Contributor

@danrmiller Could you confirm the issue in PR #1462 is fixed by this?

@kenshi84 kenshi84 changed the title account for API difference between 1.58 & 1.59 boost portable binary archive: account for API difference between 1.58 & 1.59 Dec 21, 2016
@Jaqueeee
Copy link
Contributor

it now builds but with
warning: "BOOST_VERSION" is not defined
https://build.getmonero.org/builders/monero-static-ubuntu-amd64/builds/509/steps/compile/logs/stdio

@danrmiller
Copy link
Contributor

Works.

Copy link
Contributor

@fluffypony fluffypony left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed

@fluffypony fluffypony merged commit af9a799 into monero-project:master Dec 21, 2016
fluffypony added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2016
af9a799 account for API difference between 1.58 & 1.59 (kenshi84)
@kenshi84
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Jaqueeee Thanks for your input!
@danrmiller Glad that it works:)

@kenshi84 kenshi84 deleted the boost-portable-archive branch December 21, 2016 08:36
@kenshi84 kenshi84 restored the boost-portable-archive branch December 21, 2016 09:57
@kenshi84 kenshi84 deleted the boost-portable-archive branch December 21, 2016 09:58
moneroexamples added a commit to moneroexamples/onion-monero-blockchain-explorer that referenced this pull request Dec 25, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants