Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge WIP rfcs #1

Merged
merged 17 commits into from Apr 21, 2015
Merged

Merge WIP rfcs #1

merged 17 commits into from Apr 21, 2015

Conversation

justusranvier
Copy link

No description provided.

justusranvier and others added 17 commits November 4, 2014 08:46
This BIP defines a new color kernel for transaction-based coloring.

SPOBC colored coins are undivisible and require no padding.

Since there can be only one unit, the satoshi value is not
relevant.

Smart property coins have a current position and a optional value.

The current position is unspent outpoint containing the color.

The value is up to 40 bytes of OP_RETURN data contained in the
transaction associated with the current position.
This BIP defines a new color kernel for transaction-based coloring.

DHKEC colored coins function like EPOBC, but have a method for
deriving new addresses for dividend payment which keeps dividends
seperate from the colored tokens.
Remove section on genesis output. That information will be
communicated via a different channel.

Clarify notation and indicate the shared secret is a sha256 hash

Add reference to stealth address documentation from unSYSTEM
Define base58check standards for currently-defined color kernels
to make color definitions more usable for URLs and other systems
that use base58-encoded asset identifiers.
Add JSON schema, example data, and test script for outputlist
Add JSON schema, example data, and test script for withdrawalstatuslist
Add JSON schema, example data, and test script for outbailmentid
Add JSON schema, example data, and test script for siglist
"outpoints" is a more accurate description than "transactions"
if result is not None:
print "Error validating %s against %s: %s" % (schema_file, data_file, result)
else:
print "Schema %s version %s valid." % (schema_name, schema_version)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you think it's worth the trouble, I can help you turn this into a proper unit test and have github run it automatically.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That sounds like a good idea.

@gsalgado
Copy link

👍

justusranvier added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2015
@justusranvier justusranvier merged commit 2ff4572 into monetas:master Apr 21, 2015
@justusranvier justusranvier deleted the draft branch April 21, 2015 17:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants