Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FabricBot: Onboarding to GitOps.ResourceManagement because of FabricBot decommissioning #2799

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 15, 2024

Conversation

dotnet-policy-service[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Add prIssueManagement.yml to onboard repo to GitOps.ResourceManagement as FabricBot replacement

Details on the replacement service and the syntax of the new yaml configuration file is available publicly at: https://microsoft.github.io/GitOps/policies/resource-management.html

Please review and merge this PR to complete the process of onboarding to the new service.

…t as FabricBot replacement

 Details on the replacement service and the syntax of the new yaml configuration file is available publicly at: https://microsoft.github.io/GitOps/policies/resource-management.html

Please review and merge this PR to complete the process of onboarding to the new service.
@JohannesLampel
Copy link

@dotnet-policy-service rerun

1 similar comment
@JohannesLampel
Copy link

@dotnet-policy-service rerun

@mattleibow mattleibow merged commit a81a5ab into main Mar 15, 2024
2 checks passed
@mattleibow mattleibow deleted the onboarding-ResourceManagement branch March 15, 2024 15:25
@jeffhandley
Copy link

@mattleibow FYI -- I didn't look any more closely than this, but I just did a search over fabricbot.json and saw there were 60 instances of "taskName", but the yml policy config only had 25 description: matches. You likely lost a lot of automation in this migration that is worth reviewing more closely. @JohannesLampel, did you pre-review this migration to assess which configs would be lost?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants