[WFRP4e System] Shields Ignore Armour Piercing

[moo-man]

Armour Piericing is currently not bypassing shields.
From: Bricksmarlen
foundry: 11.315
wfrp4e: 7.2.4
wfrp4e-core: 5.0.7
wfrp4e-dotr: 5.0.5
wfrp4e-eis: 5.0.3
wfrp4e-middenheim: 5.0.2
wfrp4e-rnhd: 5.0.2
wfrp4e-up-in-arms: 5.0.3
Active Modules: background-scaler, dice-so-nice, forien-ammo-swapper, forien-armoury, foundryvtt-simple-calendar, item-piles, lib-wrapper, socketlib, tabletop-rpg-music, tabletop-rpg-music-cloud-streaming, times-up, token-action-hud-core, token-action-hud-wfrp4e, wfrp4e-dotr-maps, wfrp4e-eis-maps, wfrp4e-gm-toolkit, forge-vtt, forge-vtt-optional

[moo-man]

What specifically do you mean by "Armour Piercing"?

[Forien]

I believe this is about Penetrating Weapon Property

[moo-man]

Well as usual about this topic, there is no distinction between non-metal and metal shields in the rulebook.

[Bricksmarlen]

The AP provided by the shield is not ignored in anyway by attacks with the penetrating quality. Not if they were treated as non-metal and wholly ignored or as metal and only one point being ignored.

Should shields be treated as armour and be affected by the penetrating quality or be treated as non-armour APs and ignore the penetrating quality?

[Bricksmarlen]

Thank you. Looking forward to the changes. On Monday, September 30, 2024 at 12:58:24 a.m. PDT, Russell ***@***.***> wrote: Closed #2156 as completed. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***> | | Virus-free.www.avast.com |