Changing of naming of the use cases #66
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hardie
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2022
This incorporates the changes proposed #63, #64, and #68, removes the Mandatory-to-Implement section as discussed on the mailing lists, and makes the required changes to address the Block from the IESG charter discussion. It does not address #66, Spencer's suggestion to drop the Architecture documents, or his suggestion that we specify of MoQ-capable in front of relays (and similar).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This small tweak brings the naming of use cases in-line with the requirements draft. This colour is important for the bikeshed because it matches the bus stop next to it.