Static Random Image Support

[h3xexe]

I think its a good option to have :)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1 into master will increase coverage by 3.17%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master       #1      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     85.71%   88.88%   +3.17%     
- Complexity       17       21       +4     
============================================
  Files             1        1              
  Lines            42       54      +12     
============================================
+ Hits             36       48      +12     
  Misses            6        6              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
src/PicsumProvider.php	88.88% <100.00%> (+3.17%)	21.00 <4.00> (+4.00)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3b8e8fb...d19b3cf. Read the comment docs.

[morawskim]

hello @hasanalibalcioglu,

Yeap, I agree with you. This is a good option. I have thought about adding a new parameter to the method. Currently, the id parameter allows us to fetch a specific photo. The randomize argument append-only some random number to URL to prevent fetch image from a cache by a browser. If We add a new method, we don't need to check if the user provides randomize or static argument. This will be more clear for the user. We can move creating a query string to a separate method to prevent duplication. Also for static images, we don't need a randomize argument.

[h3xexe]

Thank you for directives. As you can see i dont have much experience with tests and contributing. Is it ok now?

[morawskim]

I think this PR is ok, but Can you rename the method?

[morawskim]

Thanks @hasanalibalcioglu