-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding transcriptome in a TALON-independent way? #26
Comments
Hi! The GTF is the common format that you can use as input. It does not have to be generated from TALON! |
Thanks for your prompt reply. Sorry if I've misunderstood as I'm new to this. To my knowledge, a gtf file usually refers to the annotation gtf file, which has already been supplied in the previous step via sg.add_annotation(annot_gtf). I downloaded mine from Ensembl (https://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-111/gtf/homo_sapiens/). May I know what this transcriptome gtf is and where else can I obtain? coz I don't seem to see any other GTF-formatted file from my pipeline outputs. Thanks so much! |
Ah I see. If you are not doing transcript discovery in your data processing, you don't need to add another transcriptome GTF file, as all of the transcript that you're detecting are already from the Ensembl GTF you've mentioned. This is a characteristic I'd expect from a short-read RNA-seq data processing pipeline, am I correct in assuming this? If you are using long-read RNA-seq data, what are you using to process it? |
Hi your tutorial page mentioned that users could use other tools that yield transcriptomes as input to Swan; however, I saw that in the step of "Adding transcript models from a GTF", a gtf file ("all_talon_observedOnly.gtf") seems to be generated from TALON. I wonder if you could suggest a way to do the same without the need to use TALON. Many thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: