You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The congestion period is calculated as the time between the oldest and newest lost packets: ...
This is not what we are calculating; we calculate the time from the (previously) largest acknowledged packet. Is it a problem in that we might be hitting persistent congestion more easily?
It seems that it might be in that we might not have sent anything for a good long time between the largest acknowledged and the first packet that is lost. So it seems to me as though we need some different accounting in order to get the right start time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The spec is clear about this:
This is not what we are calculating; we calculate the time from the (previously) largest acknowledged packet. Is it a problem in that we might be hitting persistent congestion more easily?
It seems that it might be in that we might not have sent anything for a good long time between the largest acknowledged and the first packet that is lost. So it seems to me as though we need some different accounting in order to get the right start time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: