Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Miscellaneous improvements for the document properties dialog #4167

Merged

Conversation

timvandermeij
Copy link
Contributor

This PR finetunes the document properties implemention from #4149. The following changes have been made:

@@ -1486,6 +1486,16 @@ html[dir='rtl'] #documentPropertiesContainer .row > * {
text-align: right;
}

#documentPropertiesContainer .row span {
width: 125px;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this be max-width here as well?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried that, but the problem would still remain. You can try it out by opening the generated viewer and using the web console to change width to max-width and then adding a longer text.

@timvandermeij
Copy link
Contributor Author

/botio-linux preview

@pdfjsbot
Copy link

From: Bot.io (Linux)


Received

Command cmd_preview from @timvandermeij received. Current queue size: 0

Live output at: http://107.21.233.14:8877/28665a6601ef532/output.txt

@yurydelendik
Copy link
Contributor

okay, looks good

yurydelendik added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2014
Miscellaneous improvements for the document properties dialog
@yurydelendik yurydelendik merged commit 4a34556 into mozilla:master Jan 22, 2014
@timvandermeij timvandermeij deleted the followup-document-properties branch January 22, 2014 23:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants