Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Custom sandboxing implementation as linux usernamespace calls - port cachepot/#128" #1689

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Mar 27, 2023

Conversation

sylvestre
Copy link
Collaborator

Reverts #1628

causes
issue #1688

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.15 ⚠️

Comparison is base (f9cc320) 29.61% compared to head (06a5db8) 29.47%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1689      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   29.61%   29.47%   -0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          49       49              
  Lines       17032    17027       -5     
  Branches     8208     8207       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         5044     5018      -26     
- Misses       6984     6988       +4     
- Partials     5004     5021      +17     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/dist/mod.rs 33.97% <ø> (+0.21%) ⬆️

... and 17 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@sylvestre sylvestre merged commit 8742d91 into main Mar 27, 2023
70 of 72 checks passed
@Xuanwo Xuanwo deleted the revert-1628-bernhard-port-cachepot-128 branch January 18, 2024 12:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants