This repository has been archived by the owner on May 22, 2021. It is now read-only.
remove notLocalHost #138
Merged
remove notLocalHost #138
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
the
notLocalHostfield is problematic because it causes unexpected behavior when a new parameter is added to it but the environment hasn't caught up with the new variable. As example, adding the sentry_dsn, instead of simply not using sentry it forces the storage module to use the local file system instead of s3 if that env isn't set. It's better to have each variable control only the aspect of the code it's responsible for.cc @abhinadduri