Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Question: Section 5.12.4 - p. 206 - MPI_ISCATTERV sendcounts and displs Consistency #182

Closed
wesbland opened this issue Feb 19, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Question: Section 5.12.4 - p. 206 - MPI_ISCATTERV sendcounts and displs Consistency #182

wesbland opened this issue Feb 19, 2020 · 5 comments
Assignees
@jaegerj
Labels
errata Errata items for the previous MPI Standard had reading Completed the formal proposal reading passed final vote Passed the final formal vote wg-collectives Collectives Working Group

Comments

@wesbland
Copy link
Member

Problem

MPI_ISCATTERV. Are the descriptions of sendcounts and displs consistent with other expressions.

Suggested Fix
@wesbland wesbland added editor pass wg-collectives Collectives Working Group and removed chap-collectives labels Feb 19, 2020
@jaegerj
Copy link
Member

jaegerj commented Feb 21, 2020

I can look into this.

@wesbland
Copy link
Member Author

@jaegerj Once you have an idea of whether this is an errata or a full proposal, please label the issue accordingly.

@jaegerj
Copy link
Member

jaegerj commented May 12, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Compared to MPI_GatherV, MPI_Scatterv and MPI_Iscatterv don't always specify when arguments are "significant only at root".

Note: MPI_Gather is not consistant on how it specifies that an argument is "significant only at root" when the type is already present in parentheses.
For the recvbuf argument: (choice, significant only at root)
For the recvtype argument: (significant only at root) (handle)

@jaegerj
Copy link
Member

jaegerj commented May 20, 2020

Annotated MPI 4.0 pdf with red changebars.
Changes are listed on first page.
mpi40-report_issue_182.pdf

@wesbland wesbland added Chapter Committee Change Changes to be made by the respective chapter committee(s) errata Errata items for the previous MPI Standard and removed Chapter Committee Change Changes to be made by the respective chapter committee(s) labels May 20, 2020
@wesbland wesbland added had reading Completed the formal proposal reading passed final vote Passed the final formal vote labels Jul 11, 2020
@wesbland
Copy link
Member Author

This passed an errata vote on 2020-07-01.

https://www.mpi-forum.org/meetings/2020/06/votes

@wesbland wesbland closed this as completed Oct 7, 2020
@hzhou hzhou mentioned this issue Nov 16, 2020
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jaegerj jaegerj

Labels
errata Errata items for the previous MPI Standard had reading Completed the formal proposal reading passed final vote Passed the final formal vote wg-collectives Collectives Working Group
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@wesbland @jaegerj