Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update: Section 5.1 - p. 144 - Index Collective Semantics #192

Closed
wesbland opened this issue Feb 19, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Update: Section 5.1 - p. 144 - Index Collective Semantics #192

wesbland opened this issue Feb 19, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
chap-collective Collective Communication Chapter Committee Chapter Committee Change Changes to be made by the respective chapter committee(s) wg-collectives Collectives Working Group

Comments

@wesbland
Copy link
Member

Problem

Consider adding collective semantics to the index (semantics!collective communications)

Suggested Fix

Edit to update

@wesbland wesbland added editor pass wg-collectives Collectives Working Group and removed mpi-4.x labels Feb 19, 2020
@wesbland
Copy link
Member Author

wesbland commented Apr 2, 2020

Votes:

  • Editor change - 4
  • Chapter committee - 2
  • Full proposal - 1

I think the full proposal person misunderstood the problem. I'll assign this one to the chapter committee.

@wesbland wesbland added the Chapter Committee Change Changes to be made by the respective chapter committee(s) label Apr 2, 2020
@tonyskjellum
Copy link

tonyskjellum commented Jun 14, 2020

@wesbland wesbland added the chap-collective Collective Communication Chapter Committee label Jan 8, 2021
@tonyskjellum
Copy link

tonyskjellum commented Jan 11, 2021

We think this one is done. @wesbland, please confirm.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chap-collective Collective Communication Chapter Committee Chapter Committee Change Changes to be made by the respective chapter committee(s) wg-collectives Collectives Working Group
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants