You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
latest mpv & libplacebo git-master as of today.
Tested on Linux Xorg.
I btw. still think that pure power gamma 2.4 would be a better default for rec709 content, as BT.1886 just looks too bright with most of the content on any display that doesn't have an extremely low black point.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is the "bt.1886" treated like something in-between sRGB and gamma2.2 because it has hard-coded 1000 contrast over the spec's formula? That's definitely how it feels to me after experimenting.
Is the "bt.1886" treated like something in-between sRGB and gamma2.2 because it has hard-coded 1000 contrast over the spec's formula? That's definitely how it feels to me after experimenting.
Yes and no. libplacebo assumes 1000:1 contrast by default for SDR displays with unknown contrast information. If you use an ICC profile, it will instead take the effective contrast of the ICC profile's LUTs. (Note that --icc-force-contrast is currently ignored by --vo=gpu-next, this is a known limitation.)
In theory BT.1886 can be tuned to any contrast point you want, but the mpv integration does not expose all options.
--vo=gpu
:--icc-force-contrast=inf
should turn BT.1886 gamma curve into pure power 2.4, but it doesn't with--vo=gpu-next
:--vf=format:gamma=gamma2.4
can be used as a workaround.Log:
output.txt
latest mpv & libplacebo git-master as of today.
Tested on Linux Xorg.
I btw. still think that pure power gamma 2.4 would be a better default for rec709 content, as BT.1886 just looks too bright with most of the content on any display that doesn't have an extremely low black point.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: