You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
Problem
We already have
SEQ
, and we can branch onBNS
, for instance. ThusSNE
appears to be superfluous (eating up encoding space).Investigate if any code sequences would be worse if we didn't have
SNE
.Also investigate
FSNE
.Code sequences
sne r1, r1, r5
bs r1, #foo
seq r1, r1, r5
bns r1, #foo
sne r1, r1, r5
bns r1, #foo
seq r1, r1, r5
bs r1, #foo
sne r1, r1, #123
sub r1, z, r1
seq r1, r1, #123
add r1, r1, #1
a != b
-> 0 / 1 (C/C++ arithmetic)(Tricky to get working in GCC?)
sne r4, r1, #0
sel r4, r2, r3
seq r4, r1, #0
sel.132 r4, r2, r3
sne r3, r1, #0
sel r3, r2, #123
seq r3, r1, #0
xor r3, r3, #-1
sel r3, r2, #123
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: