Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some bibcode data is bad #366

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Dec 1, 2017
Merged

Some bibcode data is bad #366

merged 15 commits into from
Dec 1, 2017

Conversation

GlazerMann
Copy link
Collaborator

@GlazerMann GlazerMann commented Nov 30, 2017

Pages of "arXiv:1711.02260" is returned along with volume of "1711" and journal of "arxiv e-prints".

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 30, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #366 into development will increase coverage by 0.41%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             development     #366      +/-   ##
=================================================
+ Coverage          82.62%   83.03%   +0.41%     
- Complexity          1311     1314       +3     
=================================================
  Files                  7        7              
  Lines               2365     2370       +5     
=================================================
+ Hits                1954     1968      +14     
+ Misses               411      402       -9
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
Template.php 82.19% <100%> (+0.56%) 1247 <0> (+3) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c692031...e0c3c62. Read the comment docs.

Template.php Outdated
@@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ public function add_if_new($param_name, $value) {
return FALSE;

case "periodical": case "journal":
if (strtolower($this->get('journal')) === 'arxiv e-prints') $this->forget('journal'); // Update to real data
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we instead check that the journal title is not any of BAD_TITLES?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Excellent point. Will do. I will rue the day when a hippie starts the open access data journal “Unknown”

@ms609 ms609 merged commit e1436db into ms609:development Dec 1, 2017
@GlazerMann GlazerMann deleted the patch-24 branch December 1, 2017 14:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants