-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid access violation #732
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #732 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 69.3% 68.45% -0.85%
- Complexity 1621 1637 +16
============================================
Files 12 12
Lines 3264 3313 +49
============================================
+ Hits 2262 2268 +6
- Misses 1002 1045 +43
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to check: Does the unset()
FORCE a forget of the URL, which might be overriden / cancelled by checks in forget?
It does force it, but it does not unset via= etc. I don’t think forget has any checks. Also the unset code does crash since all the param stuff is private/protected |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, the reason that I didn't use forget here is given in the comment on the previous line; is it still desirable to supress the echo? If not, let's remove the comment; if so, let's add a new function quietly_forget
.
@ms609 done |
The current code crashes