-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
test_rules.py
1121 lines (954 loc) · 46 KB
/
test_rules.py
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
from copy import deepcopy
import logging
import os
from typing import Type
from dotenv import load_dotenv
from legislice.download import Client
from legislice.groups import EnactmentGroup
from nettlesome.terms import ContextRegister, means
from nettlesome.entities import Entity
from nettlesome.terms import Explanation
from nettlesome.groups import FactorGroup
from nettlesome.predicates import Predicate
from nettlesome.quantities import Comparison, Q_
from nettlesome.statements import Statement
import pytest
from authorityspoke.facts import Fact
from authorityspoke.holdings import Holding
from authorityspoke.procedures import Procedure
from authorityspoke.rules import Rule
from authorityspoke.io import loaders, readers
from authorityspoke.io.fake_enactments import FakeClient
load_dotenv()
TOKEN = os.getenv("LEGISLICE_API_TOKEN")
legislice_client = Client(api_token=TOKEN)
class TestRules:
def test_enactment_type_in_str(self, make_holding):
assert "const" in str(make_holding["h1"]).lower()
def test_no_blank_line_in_str(self, make_holding):
assert "\n\n" not in str(make_holding["h2"])
def test_enactment_text_in_str(self, make_holding):
assert "secure in their persons" in str(make_holding["h1"])
def test_None_not_in_str(self, make_holding):
assert "None" not in str(make_holding["h2"])
def test_str_without_legislation(self, make_holding):
assert "legislation" not in str(make_holding["h_output_distance_less"])
def test_new_concrete_context(self, make_holding):
different = make_holding["h1"].new_context(
[Entity("Castle Grayskull"), Entity("He-Man")]
)
assert "<He-Man> operated" in str(different)
def test_terms_of_rule_are_its_factors(self, make_rule):
assert len(make_rule["h1"].terms) == 3
def test_new_context_non_generic(self, make_holding, watt_factor):
changes = ContextRegister()
changes.insert_pair(watt_factor["f1"], watt_factor["f7"])
different = make_holding["h1"].new_context(changes)
assert "the distance between <Hideaway Lodge> and" in str(different)
def test_new_context_non_generic_from_list_error(self, make_holding, watt_factor):
with pytest.raises(ValueError):
make_holding["h1"].new_context(
[watt_factor["f1"], watt_factor["f7"], watt_factor["f2"]]
)
def test_generic_term_by_str(self, make_rule):
holding = make_rule["h2"]
assert len(holding.generic_terms_by_str()) == 2
holding.generic = True
result = holding.generic_terms_by_str()
assert len(result) == 1
def test_cannot_change_context_with_predicates(self, make_holding, make_predicate):
with pytest.raises(TypeError):
make_holding["h1"].new_context({make_predicate["p1"]: make_predicate["p7"]})
def test_cannot_change_context_with_dict_and_terms(
self, make_holding, make_predicate
):
with pytest.raises(TypeError):
make_holding["h1"].new_context(
{make_predicate["p1"]: make_predicate["p7"]},
terms_to_replace=[Entity("Bob")],
)
def test_new_context_dict_must_be_dict(self, make_holding, make_predicate):
with pytest.raises(TypeError):
make_holding["h1"].new_context([make_predicate["p1"], make_predicate["p2"]])
def test_new_context_choose_factor_to_replace_by_name(self, make_beard_rule):
transfer_rule = make_beard_rule[11]
barber_rule = make_beard_rule[-1]
defendant = transfer_rule.generic_terms()[0]
counterparty = transfer_rule.generic_terms()[2]
defendant_rule = barber_rule.new_context(
changes=[defendant, counterparty],
terms_to_replace=[Entity("the barber"), Entity("the customer")],
)
assert defendant_rule.generic_terms()[1].name == "the defendant"
def test_generic_terms(self, make_entity, make_holding):
generics = make_holding["h3"].generic_terms()
assert make_entity["motel"] in generics
assert make_entity["tree_search"] in generics
def test_despite_only_in_str_when_relevant(self, make_holding):
assert "despite the legislation" not in str(make_holding["h1"].rule)
def test_generic_terms_order(self, make_entity, make_holding):
"""The motel is mentioned in the first input in the JSON,
so it should be first."""
generics = make_holding["h1"].generic_terms()
assert list(generics) == [make_entity["motel"], make_entity["watt"]]
def test_string_with_line_breaks(self, make_opinion_with_holding):
cardenas = make_opinion_with_holding["cardenas_majority"]
assert "was addicted to heroin,\n" in str(cardenas.holdings[0])
def test_string_mentions_absence(self, make_opinion_with_holding):
cardenas = make_opinion_with_holding["cardenas_majority"]
assert "absence of the evidence" in str(cardenas.holdings[1]).lower()
def test_factor_properties_for_rule(self, make_opinion_with_holding):
cardenas = make_opinion_with_holding["cardenas_majority"]
assert len(cardenas.holdings[1].inputs) == 1
assert len(cardenas.holdings[1].outputs) == 1
assert len(cardenas.holdings[1].despite) == 1
def test_single_enactment_converted_to_tuple(self, make_holding):
assert isinstance(make_holding["h2"].enactments, EnactmentGroup)
def test_holding_len(self, make_holding):
assert len(make_holding["h1"]) == 2
assert len(make_holding["h3"]) == 5
def test_despite_role_for_added_enactment(self, e_due_process_14, make_holding):
rule = make_holding["h1"].rule.with_enactment_despite(e_due_process_14)
assert "life, liberty, or property" in str(rule).split("DESPITE")[1]
def test_despite_role_for_added_enactment_typeerror(self, make_holding):
with pytest.raises(TypeError):
make_holding["h1"].rule.add_enactment_despite(make_holding["h2"])
def test_add_enactment_typeerror(self, make_holding):
with pytest.raises(TypeError):
make_holding["h1"].rule.add_enactment(make_holding["h2"])
class TestSameMeaning:
def test_holdings_equivalent_entity_orders_equal(self, make_rule):
"""
Test that holdings are considered equal if they have the same factors
and the numbers they use to refer to entities are different but in an
equivalent order.
e.g. {"F1": "1,2,1", "F2": "2,0,0"} and {"F2": "1,2,2", "F1": "0,1,0"}
"""
assert make_rule["h1"].means(make_rule["h1_entity_order"])
def test_added_enactment_changes_meaning(self, make_complex_rule, e_due_process_5):
due_process_rule = (
make_complex_rule["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance"] + e_due_process_5
)
assert not due_process_rule.means(
make_complex_rule["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance"]
)
assert not make_complex_rule["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance"].means(
due_process_rule
)
def test_holdings_different_entities_unequal(self, make_rule):
assert not make_rule["h1"].means(make_rule["h1_easy"])
def test_holdings_differing_in_entity_order_equal(self, make_rule):
assert make_rule["h1"].means(make_rule["h1_entity_order"])
def test_holdings_citing_different_enactment_text_unequal(self, make_rule):
assert not make_rule["h2"].means(make_rule["h2_fourth_a_cite"])
def test_explain_rule_differing_in_entity_order(self, make_complex_rule):
left = make_complex_rule["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance_and_shooting"]
right = make_complex_rule[
"accept_murder_fact_from_relevance_and_shooting_craig"
]
explanation = left.explain_same_meaning(right)
assert "<Craig> is like <Alice>" in str(
explanation
) or "<Alice> is like <Craig>" in str(explanation)
assert "<Dan> is like <Bob>" in str(
explanation
) or "<Bob> is like <Dan>" in str(explanation)
class TestImplication:
def test_rule_does_not_imply_procedure(self, make_rule):
with pytest.raises(TypeError):
make_rule["h1"].implies(make_rule["h1"].procedure)
def test_holdings_more_inputs_implies_fewer(self, make_rule):
assert make_rule["h1"] > make_rule["h1_easy"]
assert make_rule["h2_irrelevant_inputs"] > make_rule["h2"]
def test_holding_narrower_despite_implies_broader(self, make_rule):
assert make_rule["h2_exact_in_despite"] > make_rule["h2"]
assert not make_rule["h2"] > make_rule["h2_exact_in_despite"]
def test_explain_implication_same_entities(self, make_rule):
"""
Checks that because the generic entities on both sides of the implication
relation are the same, the "Hideaway Lodge" Entity corresponds to an equal object.
"""
explanation = make_rule["h2_exact_in_despite"].explain_implication(
make_rule["h2"]
)
assert explanation.context.get("<Hideaway Lodge>").key == "<Hideaway Lodge>"
def test_explain_all_to_all_implies_reciprocal(self, make_rule):
"""
There's only one explanation for how the factors can match between these two Rules.
The explanation simply matches each context factor to the same factor.
"""
fewer_inputs = make_rule["h3_fewer_inputs_ALL"]
explanation = fewer_inputs.explain_implication(make_rule["h3_ALL"])
assert explanation.context.get("<Hideaway Lodge>").key == "<Hideaway Lodge>"
def test_holdings_more_specific_quantity_implies_less_specific(self, make_rule):
assert make_rule["h2_exact_quantity"] > make_rule["h2"]
def test_holdings_less_specific_with_all_implies_more_specific(self, make_rule):
assert make_rule["h2_ALL"] > make_rule["h2_exact_quantity_ALL"]
assert not make_rule["h2_exact_quantity_ALL"] > make_rule["h2_ALL"]
def test_specific_holding_with_all_implies_more_general_with_some(self, make_rule):
assert make_rule["h2_exact_quantity_ALL"] > make_rule["h2"]
def test_mandatory_implies_permissive(self, make_rule):
assert make_rule["h2_MUST"] > make_rule["h2"]
assert not make_rule["h2"] > make_rule["h2_MUST"]
def test_all_to_all(self, make_rule):
"""This is supposed to test reciprocal predicates in despite factors."""
assert make_rule["h2_exact_in_despite_ALL"] > make_rule["h2_ALL"]
def test_all_to_all_reciprocal(self, make_rule, caplog):
"""
The entity order shouldn't matter, compared to test_all_to_all,
because it's the mirror image of the normal entity order.
"""
caplog.set_level(logging.DEBUG)
assert make_rule["h2_exact_in_despite_ALL_entity_order"] > make_rule["h2_ALL"]
def test_some_holding_does_not_imply_version_with_more_supporting_factors(
self, make_rule
):
"""A version of h2 with some supporting factors removed does not imply
h2.
A SOME holding means that a court has actually applied the procedure in
some case. If it also implied variations of itself with other supporting
inputs added, that would mean that every SOME holding would imply every
possible variation of itself that could be constructed by substituting
any different set of supporting inputs."""
assert not make_rule["h_near_means_curtilage_even_if"] >= make_rule["h2"]
assert make_rule["h_near_means_curtilage_even_if"] <= make_rule["h2"]
def test_implication_with_evidence(self, make_rule):
assert make_rule["h3"] > make_rule["h3_fewer_inputs"]
def test_holding_based_on_less_text_implies_more(self, make_rule):
"""The implied holding is based on enactment text that is a superset
of the implying holding's enactment text."""
assert make_rule["h2"] > make_rule["h2_fourth_a_cite"]
def test_holding_with_enactment_cite_does_not_imply_without(self, make_rule):
"""Just because an outcome is required by enactment text doesn't mean
the court would require it pursuant to its common law power to make laws."""
assert not make_rule["h2"] >= make_rule["h2_without_cite"]
def test_implication_common_law_and_constitutional(self, make_rule):
"""When a court asserts a holding as valid without legislative support,
the court is actually making a broader statement than it would be making
if it cited legislative support. The holding without legislative support
doesn't depend for its validity on the enactment remaining in effect without
being repealed.
The relative priority of the holdings is a different
matter. Statutory holdings trump common law holdings, and constitutional
trumps statutory."""
assert make_rule["h2"] <= make_rule["h2_without_cite"]
def test_no_implication_of_holding_with_added_despite_enactment(self, make_rule):
assert not make_rule["h2"] >= make_rule["h2_despite_due_process"]
def test_implication_of_holding_with_removed_despite_enactment(self, make_rule):
assert make_rule["h2_despite_due_process"] >= make_rule["h2"]
def test_implication_more_specific_input(self, make_complex_rule):
"""
A universal Rule is contravariant with its inputs.
When an input becomes more specific, the Rule becomes less specific.
"""
small_reliable = make_complex_rule["accept_small_weight_reliable"]
small_more_reliable = make_complex_rule[
"accept_small_weight_reliable_more_evidence"
]
assert small_reliable >= small_more_reliable
assert not small_more_reliable >= small_reliable
def test_implication_more_specific_output(self, make_complex_rule):
"""
A Rule is covariant with its outputs.
When an output becomes more specific, the Rule becomes more specific.
"""
small_reliable = make_complex_rule["accept_small_weight_reliable"]
large_reliable = make_complex_rule["accept_large_weight_reliable"]
assert not small_reliable >= large_reliable
assert large_reliable >= small_reliable
def test_implies_holding(self, make_complex_rule):
"""
The Rule class doesn't know anything about the Holding class, but it
should check whether Holding has an is_implied_by method and call it.
"""
small_reliable = make_complex_rule["accept_small_weight_reliable"]
small_more_reliable_holding = Holding(
make_complex_rule["accept_small_weight_reliable_more_evidence"]
)
assert small_reliable >= small_more_reliable_holding
def test_does_not_imply_holding_due_to_context(self, make_complex_rule):
"""
The Rule class doesn't know anything about the Holding class, but it
should check whether Holding has an is_implied_by method and call it.
"""
small_reliable = make_complex_rule["accept_small_weight_reliable"]
small_more_reliable_holding = Holding(
make_complex_rule["accept_small_weight_reliable_more_evidence"]
)
assert not small_reliable.implies(
small_more_reliable_holding,
context=ContextRegister.from_lists([Entity("Alice")], [Entity("Bob")]),
)
def test_implication_interchangeable_terms(self):
ate_together = Predicate(content="$person1 ate at $place with $person2")
shot = Predicate(content="$attacker shot $victim")
murder = Predicate(content="$attacker murdered $victim")
alice = Entity("Alice")
bob = Entity("Bob")
diane = Entity("Diane")
ed = Entity("Ed")
grove = Entity("Shady Grove")
magnolia = Entity("Magnolia Cafe")
alice_and_bob_rule = Rule(
procedure=Procedure(
outputs=(Fact(predicate=murder, terms=(alice, bob))),
inputs=(
Fact(predicate=ate_together, terms=(alice, grove, bob)),
Fact(predicate=shot, terms=(alice, bob)),
),
),
mandatory=True,
universal=True,
)
diane_and_ed_rule = Rule(
procedure=Procedure(
outputs=(Fact(predicate=murder, terms=(diane, ed))),
inputs=(
Fact(predicate=ate_together, terms=(ed, magnolia, diane)),
Fact(predicate=shot, terms=(diane, ed)),
),
),
mandatory=True,
universal=True,
)
assert alice_and_bob_rule.implies(diane_and_ed_rule)
def test_not_implied_by_statement(self, make_rule):
assert not Statement(
Predicate("$person was a person"), terms=Entity("Alice")
).implies(make_rule["h1"])
def test_not_implied_by_procedure(self, make_procedure, make_rule):
assert not make_rule["h1"].implied_by(make_procedure["c1"])
def test_error_to_check_implies_procedure(self, make_procedure, make_rule):
with pytest.raises(TypeError):
make_rule["h1"].implies(make_procedure["c1"])
class TestContradiction:
def test_some_holding_consistent_with_absent_output(self, make_rule):
assert not make_rule["h2"].contradicts(make_rule["h2_output_absent"])
assert not make_rule["h2_output_absent"].contradicts(make_rule["h2"])
def test_some_holding_consistent_with_false_output(self, make_rule):
assert not make_rule["h2"].contradicts(make_rule["h2_output_false"])
assert not make_rule["h2_output_false"].contradicts(make_rule["h2"])
def test_some_holding_consistent_with_absent_false_output(self, make_rule):
assert not make_rule["h2"].contradicts(make_rule["h2_output_absent_false"])
assert not make_rule["h2_output_absent_false"].contradicts(make_rule["h2"])
def test_contradicts_if_valid_some_vs_all(self, make_rule):
"""
This test and the one below show that you can change whether two
holdings contradict one another by exchanging the SOME/MAY from one
with the ALL/MUST from the other.
The assertion here is:
In SOME cases where the distance between A and B is less than 20 feet
the court MUST find that
A is in the curtilage of B
contradicts
In ALL cases where the distance between A and B is less than 35 feet
the court MAY find that
A is not in the curtilage of B
"""
assert make_rule["h_nearer_means_curtilage_MUST"].contradicts(
make_rule["h_near_means_no_curtilage_ALL"]
)
assert make_rule["h_near_means_no_curtilage_ALL"].contradicts(
make_rule["h_nearer_means_curtilage_MUST"]
)
def test_contradicts_if_valid_some_vs_all_no_contradiction(self, make_rule):
"""
This test and the one above show that you can change whether two
holdings contradict one another by exchanging the SOME/MAY from one
with the ALL/MUST from the other.
The assertion here is:
In SOME cases where the distance between A and B is less than 35 feet
the court MAY find that
A is not in the curtilage of B
does not contradict
In ALL cases where the distance between A and B is less than 20 feet
the court MUST find that
A is in the curtilage of B
"""
assert not make_rule["h_near_means_no_curtilage"].contradicts(
make_rule["h_nearer_means_curtilage_ALL"]
)
assert not make_rule["h_nearer_means_curtilage_ALL"].contradicts(
make_rule["h_near_means_no_curtilage"]
)
def test_contradicts_if_valid_all_vs_some(self, make_rule):
"""
The assertion here is:
In ALL cases where the distance between A and B is less than 35 feet
the court MUST find that
A is not in the curtilage of B
contradicts
In SOME cases where the distance between A and B is less than 20 feet
the court MAY find that
A is in the curtilage of B
"""
assert make_rule["h_near_means_no_curtilage_ALL_MUST"].contradicts(
make_rule["h_nearer_means_curtilage"]
)
assert make_rule["h_nearer_means_curtilage"].contradicts(
make_rule["h_near_means_no_curtilage_ALL_MUST"]
)
def test_no_contradiction_quantity_outputs(self, make_rule):
"""
Added to try to break Procedure.contradiction_between_outputs.
"the distance between {the stockpile of trees} and a parking area
used by personnel and patrons of {Hideaway Lodge} was <= 5 feet"
does not contradict
"the distance between {circus} and a parking area used by personnel
and patrons of {Hideaway Lodge} was > 5 feet"
Given that the context parameter indicates the "circus" is not the
same place as "the stockpile of trees", there's no contradiction.
"""
stockpile_means_stockpile = ContextRegister()
stockpile_means_stockpile.insert_pair(
key=Entity("the stockpile of trees"), value=Entity("the stockpile of trees")
)
assert not make_rule["h_output_distance_less"].contradicts(
make_rule["h_output_farther_different_entity"],
context=stockpile_means_stockpile,
)
assert not make_rule["h_output_farther_different_entity"].contradicts(
make_rule["h_output_distance_less"], context=stockpile_means_stockpile
)
def test_contradicts_overlapping_ranges_all_vs_all(self, make_rule):
"""
Test that contradictory assertions about overlapping ranges are contradictory.
The assertion here is:
In ALL cases where the distance between A and B is less than 35 feet
the court MUST find that
A is in the curtilage of B
contradicts
In ALL cases where the distance between A and B is more than 20 feet
the court MAY find that
A is not in the curtilage of B
EVEN IF the distance between A and B is less than 35 feet
This test passed before only because of a bug.
Now it passes because of the addition of the EVEN IF clause.
Should it pass without the EVEN IF clause?
Or would it be a mistake to assume there are any cases where the distance is
between 20 and 35 feet?
"""
assert make_rule["h_near_means_curtilage_ALL_MUST"].contradicts(
make_rule["h_far_means_no_curtilage_ALL"]
)
assert make_rule["h_far_means_no_curtilage_ALL"].contradicts(
make_rule["h_near_means_curtilage_ALL_MUST"]
)
def test_contradicts_exact_quantity_all_vs_all(self, make_rule):
assert make_rule["h_near_means_curtilage_ALL_MUST"].contradicts(
make_rule["h_exact_means_no_curtilage_ALL"]
)
assert make_rule["h_exact_means_no_curtilage_ALL"].contradicts(
make_rule["h_near_means_curtilage_ALL_MUST"]
)
def test_always_may_contradicts_sometimes_must_not(self, make_rule):
assert make_rule["h2_ALL"].contradicts(make_rule["h2_SOME_MUST_output_false"])
assert make_rule["h2_SOME_MUST_output_false"].contradicts(make_rule["h2_ALL"])
def test_always_may_contradicts_sometimes_must_omit_output(self, make_rule):
assert make_rule["h2_ALL"].contradicts(make_rule["h2_SOME_MUST_output_absent"])
assert make_rule["h2_SOME_MUST_output_absent"].contradicts(make_rule["h2_ALL"])
def test_sometimes_must_contradicts_always_may_not(self, make_rule):
assert make_rule["h2_MUST"].contradicts(make_rule["h2_ALL_MAY_output_false"])
assert make_rule["h2_ALL_MAY_output_false"].contradicts(make_rule["h2_MUST"])
def test_sometimes_must_contradicts_always_must_not(self, make_rule):
assert make_rule["h2_MUST"].contradicts(make_rule["h2_ALL_MUST_output_false"])
assert make_rule["h2_ALL_MUST_output_false"].contradicts(make_rule["h2_MUST"])
def test_some_must_no_contradict_some_may(self, make_rule):
assert not make_rule["h2_MUST"].contradicts(make_rule["h2"])
assert not make_rule["h2"].contradicts(make_rule["h2_MUST"])
def test_abbreviated_contradiction_with_distance(
self, make_opinion_with_holding, make_holding
):
watt = make_opinion_with_holding["watt_majority"]
watt_rule = list(watt.holdings)[1].rule
must_not_rule = make_holding["h2_output_false_ALL_MUST"]
watt_rule.procedure.inputs = FactorGroup([watt_rule.inputs[3]])
must_not_rule.procedure.inputs = FactorGroup([must_not_rule.inputs[3]])
assert watt_rule.contradicts(must_not_rule)
# Contradiction of other types
def test_rule_does_not_contradict_none(self, make_rule):
assert not make_rule["h1"].contradicts(None)
def test_sometimes_must_contradicts_holding_always_must_not(
self, make_rule, make_holding
):
assert make_rule["h2_MUST"].contradicts(
make_holding["h2_ALL_MUST_output_false"]
)
def test_error_testing_contradiction_of_fact(self, make_rule, watt_factor):
with pytest.raises(TypeError):
make_rule["h2_MUST"].contradicts(watt_factor["f2"])
def test_error_for_contradiction_of_predicate(self, make_rule, watt_factor):
with pytest.raises(TypeError):
make_rule["h2_MUST"].contradicts(watt_factor["f2"].predicate)
class TestAddition:
def test_add_factor_and_rule(self, make_complex_rule, make_factor):
"""
Test that you can make a new version of a :class:`.Rule`,
with one more input :class:`.Factor`, by using the addition operator with
the :class:`.Rule` and input :class:`.Factor`.
"""
c = make_complex_rule
assert not c["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance"].means(
c["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance_and_shooting"]
)
two_input_rule = (
c["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance"] + make_factor["f_shooting"]
)
assert two_input_rule.means(c["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance_and_shooting"])
def test_add_factor_to_rule_in_place(self, make_complex_rule, make_factor):
"""
Test that you can make a new version of a :class:`.Rule`,
with one more input :class:`.Factor`, by using the addition operator with
the :class:`.Rule` and input :class:`.Factor`.
"""
c = make_complex_rule
assert not c["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance"].means(
c["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance_and_shooting"]
)
two_input_rule = deepcopy(c["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance"])
two_input_rule.add_factor(make_factor["f_shooting"])
assert two_input_rule.means(c["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance_and_shooting"])
def test_add_contradictory_factor_to_rule_in_place(
self, make_complex_rule, make_factor
):
"""
Test that you can make a new version of a :class:`.Rule`,
with one more input :class:`.Factor`, by using the addition operator with
the :class:`.Rule` and input :class:`.Factor`.
"""
c = make_complex_rule
assert not c["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance"].means(
c["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance_and_shooting"]
)
two_input_rule = deepcopy(c["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance"])
with pytest.raises(ValueError):
two_input_rule.add_factor(two_input_rule.inputs[0].negated())
def test_cannot_add_holding_to_rule(self, make_rule, make_holding):
with pytest.raises(TypeError):
make_rule["h1"] + make_holding["h1"]
def test_add_enactment_to_rule_reverse(self, make_complex_rule, e_due_process_5):
"""
Test that you can make a new version of a :class:`.Rule`,
with one more input :class:`.Factor`, by using the addition operator with
the :class:`.Rule` and input :class:`.Factor`.
"""
murder_rule = make_complex_rule["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance"]
assert e_due_process_5 not in murder_rule.enactments
due_process_murder_rule = murder_rule + e_due_process_5
assert e_due_process_5 in due_process_murder_rule.enactments
def test_add_enactment_to_rule(self, make_complex_rule, e_due_process_5):
"""
Test that you can make a new version of a :class:`.Rule`,
with one more input :class:`.Factor`, by using the addition operator with
the :class:`.Rule` and input :class:`.Factor`.
"""
murder_rule = make_complex_rule["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance"]
assert e_due_process_5 not in murder_rule.enactments
due_process_murder_rule = murder_rule + e_due_process_5
assert e_due_process_5 in due_process_murder_rule.enactments
def test_add_simple_rules(self):
"""
A simple form of two Rules from Feist, with no Enactments.
Even though the rules have different generic Factors (i.e. Entities),
the __add__ function will make one Rule using the generic Factors from
the operand on the left, but will give it the output from the operand
on the right.
"""
context = Entity("the Pythagorean theorem")
three = Entity("the number three")
fact_not_original = Rule(
Procedure(
inputs=Fact(Predicate("$work was a fact"), terms=context),
outputs=Fact(
Predicate("$work was an original work", truth=False),
terms=context,
),
),
universal=True,
)
unoriginal_not_copyrightable = Rule(
Procedure(
inputs=Fact(
Predicate("$work was an original work", truth=False),
terms=three,
),
outputs=Fact(
Predicate("${work} was copyrightable", truth=False),
terms=three,
),
),
universal=True,
)
facts_not_copyrightable = fact_not_original + unoriginal_not_copyrightable
assert len(facts_not_copyrightable.inputs) == 1
assert str(facts_not_copyrightable.inputs[0]).endswith(
"act that <the Pythagorean theorem> was a fact"
)
assert len(facts_not_copyrightable.outputs) == 2
assert "false that <the Pythagorean theorem> was copyrightable" in str(
facts_not_copyrightable.outputs
)
def test_add_rules_with_duplicate_enactment_text(
self, e_copyright_requires_originality, make_opinion_with_holding
):
"""
test implication between
telephone listings -> not original (feist.holdings[11])
+
not original -> not copyrightable (feist.holdings[3])
=
telephone listings -> not copyrightable
listings_not_original now has all the Enactments it needs
on its own. The addition expression should not result in
duplicated text.
"""
feist = make_opinion_with_holding["feist_majority"]
listings_not_original = feist.holdings[10].rule
inferred_holding = feist.holdings[3].inferred_from_exclusive[0]
unoriginal_not_copyrightable = inferred_holding.rule
listings_not_copyrightable = (
listings_not_original
+ e_copyright_requires_originality
+ unoriginal_not_copyrightable
)
assert len(listings_not_copyrightable.inputs) == 1
assert any(
out.short_string
== (
"absence of the fact that <Rural's telephone listings> were copyrightable"
)
for out in listings_not_copyrightable.outputs
)
assert (
listings_not_copyrightable.short_string.count(
"in accordance with this title"
)
== 1
)
def test_add_some_plus_some_makes_none(self, make_complex_rule):
"""The rules can't be added because they both have universal==False"""
new_rule = (
make_complex_rule["accept_relevance_testimony"]
+ make_complex_rule["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance"]
)
assert new_rule is None
def test_add_complex_rule(self, make_complex_rule):
"""
The resulting rule will have universal==False because one of the
two input rules has universal==False.
"""
new_rule = (
make_complex_rule["accept_relevance_testimony_ALL"]
+ make_complex_rule["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance"]
)
assert new_rule.universal is False
assert new_rule.inputs.means(
make_complex_rule["accept_relevance_testimony_ALL"].inputs
)
assert any(
make_complex_rule["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance"]
.outputs[0]
.means(output)
for output in new_rule.outputs
)
def test_add_disconnected_rules_returns_none(self, make_rule):
assert make_rule["h1"] + make_rule["h2_ALL"] is None
def test_add_universal_to_universal(
self, make_factor, make_exhibit, make_complex_fact
):
accept_relevance_testimony_ALL = Rule(
Procedure(
inputs=make_exhibit["relevant_murder_testimony"],
outputs=make_complex_fact["f_relevant_murder"],
),
universal=True,
)
accept_murder_fact_ALL = Rule(
Procedure(
inputs=make_complex_fact["f_relevant_murder"],
outputs=make_factor["f_murder"],
),
universal=True,
)
result = accept_relevance_testimony_ALL + accept_murder_fact_ALL
assert result.universal is True
def test_add_universal_to_universal_irrelevant(self, make_procedure):
result = make_procedure["c3"] + make_procedure["c2_irrelevant_inputs"]
assert result is None
def test_rule_requiring_more_enactments_will_add(
self, e_due_process_5, make_complex_rule
):
due_process_rule = (
make_complex_rule["accept_murder_fact_from_relevance"] + e_due_process_5
)
combined = (
make_complex_rule["accept_relevance_testimony_ALL"] + due_process_rule
)
assert len(combined.outputs) == 2
assert "the fact that <Alice> murdered <Bob>" in str(combined.outputs)
assert "ATTRIBUTED TO <Alice>" in str(combined)
class TestUnion:
def test_union_with_none(self, make_rule):
rule = make_rule["h2"]
assert rule | None == rule
def test_union_contradictory_outputs(self, make_opinion_with_holding):
"""
Test that even when two Rules don't contradict each other,
their union will be None if any of their outputs contradict.
"""
feist = make_opinion_with_holding["feist_majority"]
assert not feist.holdings[1].contradicts(feist.holdings[2])
assert feist.holdings[1].outputs[0].contradicts(feist.holdings[2].outputs[0])
assert feist.holdings[1] | feist.holdings[2] is None
def test_union_basic(self, make_opinion_with_holding):
feist = make_opinion_with_holding["feist_majority"]
new_rule = feist.holdings[0].rule | feist.holdings[2].rule
assert len(new_rule.inputs) == 2
assert len(new_rule.outputs) == 1
# The two Enactments will be:
# 1.
# 'To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts,
# by securing for limited Times to Authors...the exclusive Right
# to their respective Writings...'
# 2.
# 'The copyright in a compilation...extends only to the material
# contributed by the author of such work, as distinguished from
# the preexisting material employed in the work, and does not
# imply any exclusive right in the preexisting material....'
assert len(new_rule.enactments) == 2
def test_union_of_rule_and_holding(self, make_opinion_with_holding):
feist = make_opinion_with_holding["feist_majority"]
new_holding = feist.holdings[0].rule | feist.holdings[2]
assert isinstance(new_holding, Holding)
assert len(new_holding.inputs) == 2
assert len(new_holding.outputs) == 1
assert len(new_holding.enactments) == 2
def test_union_rule_and_fact(self, make_opinion_with_holding, make_factor):
feist = make_opinion_with_holding["feist_majority"]
with pytest.raises(TypeError):
feist.holdings[0].rule | make_factor["f_irrelevant_0"]
def test_union_longer(self, make_opinion_with_holding):
feist = make_opinion_with_holding["feist_majority"]
new_rule = feist.holdings[4].rule | feist.holdings[6].rule
assert len(new_rule.inputs) == 6
assert len(new_rule.outputs) == 1
assert len(new_rule.despite) == 1
assert new_rule.universal is False
assert new_rule.mandatory is False
def test_union_same_output(self, make_opinion_with_holding):
"""
The two Rules being combined both same the same output
Factor (and they both have only one output Factor).
The combined Rule should also have just that one
output Factor.
"""
lotus = make_opinion_with_holding["lotus_majority"]
lotus_not_copyrightable = lotus.holdings[6].rule
feist = make_opinion_with_holding["feist_majority"]
feist_not_copyrightable = feist.holdings[0].rule
new_rule = lotus_not_copyrightable | feist_not_copyrightable
assert len(new_rule.outputs) == 1
def test_union_implied_but_not_universal_easy(self, make_rule):
"""
Tests that when you take the union of Rule A with another Rule
that only differs in that its input Factors are a subset of Rule A's,
the answer is Rule A.
"""
assert (make_rule["h1"] | make_rule["h1_easy"]).means(make_rule["h1"])
def test_union_implied_but_not_universal(self, make_rule):
"""
This is similar to the test above, except that the first Rule
also has some generic context Factors that the second
Rule doesn't.
"""
a = make_rule["h2_irrelevant_inputs"]
b = make_rule["h2"]
assert (a | b).means(a)
def test_union_implied_change_context(self, make_rule):
"""
The correct Entities need to be assigned to the context factors
in a new Procedure created with the __or__ method.
"""
original_on_left = make_rule["h1_easy"] | make_rule["h1_entity_order"]
assert "act that <Hideaway Lodge> was <Wattenburg>’s abode" in str(
original_on_left
)
def test_union_implied_change_context_reverse(self, make_rule):
original_on_right = make_rule["h1_entity_order"] | make_rule["h1_easy"]
assert "that <Wattenburg> was <Hideaway Lodge>’s abode" in str(
original_on_right
)
def test_union_change_context(self, make_opinion_with_holding):
"""
When the union operation is applied to the Rules, a fact that
related to <the Java API> in the original is mentioned relating
to <the Lotus menu command hierarchy> instead.
"""
lotus = make_opinion_with_holding["lotus_majority"]
oracle = make_opinion_with_holding["oracle_majority"]
# changing one of the Rules to universal because otherwise
# nothing can be inferred by their union.
lotus_rule = deepcopy(lotus.holdings[2].rule)
lotus_rule.universal = True
new = lotus_rule | oracle.holdings[2].rule
assert new.mandatory is False
assert (
"<the Lotus menu command hierarchy> was the expression of an idea"
in new.short_string
)
def test_union_one_generic_not_matched(self, make_opinion_with_holding):
"""
Here, both Rules have the input "fact that <> was a computer program".
But they each have another generic that can't be matched:
fact that <the Java API> was a literal element of <the Java language>
and
fact that <the Lotus menu command hierarchy> provided the means by
which users controlled and operated <Lotus 1-2-3>
"""
lotus = make_opinion_with_holding["lotus_majority"]
oracle = make_opinion_with_holding["oracle_majority"]
new = lotus.holdings[7].rule | oracle.holdings[3].rule
text = (
"that <the Lotus menu command hierarchy> was a "
"literal element of <Lotus 1-2-3>"
)
assert text in new.short_string
def test_union_returns_universal(self, make_rule):
"""
an ALL rule should be
returned even though ``implied`` is SOME, because
``implied`` contributes no information that wasn't
already in ``greater``.
"""
new_rule = make_rule["h2_ALL_due_process"] | make_rule["h2"]
assert len(new_rule.enactments) == 2
assert new_rule.universal
def test_union_inconsistent_outputs(self, make_opinion_with_holding):
"""
The union operator should return a rule with all the inputs of both Rules
(including input Enactments) and all the outputs of both Rules.
This returns None because the outputs are inconsistent
(True and False versions of the same Rule)
"""
feist = make_opinion_with_holding["feist_majority"]
feist_copyrightable = feist.holdings[3].rule
oracle = make_opinion_with_holding["oracle_majority"]
oracle_copyrightable = oracle.holdings[0].rule
assert feist_copyrightable | oracle_copyrightable is None
class TestStatuteRules:
"""
Tests from the statute_rules Jupyter Notebook.
"""
client = Client(api_token=TOKEN)