update to sphinx bugfix version

docs/api/opinions.rst

@@ -5,3 +5,8 @@ Opinions
 .. autoclass:: authorityspoke.opinions.Opinion
    :members:
    :special-members:
+
+
+.. autoclass:: authorityspoke.opinions.AnchoredHoldings
+   :members:
+   :special-members:

docs/guides/load_yaml_holdings.rst

@@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ citation of the case we want, we'll use the :meth:`~authorityspoke.io.downloads.
     >>> print(licensing_case)
     United States v. Mazza-Alaluf, 621 F.3d 205 (2010-09-22)
 
+Because we used ``full_case=True``, we have the option to view the full
+text of the majority opinion using the command
+``licensing_case.majority.text``.
+
 
 Creating Holdings with Python
 -----------------------------
@@ -571,3 +575,13 @@ Now when we load a file with this YAML, we'll get both Holdings.
     >>>     client=LEGIS_CLIENT)
     >>> len(both_holdings_with_anchors.holdings)
     2
+
+Now that we generated this :class:`~authorityspoke.opinions.AnchoredHoldings` object 
+containing the data from the YAML file, we can use the posit method to link those 
+:class:`~authorityspoke.holdings.Holding`\s to the judicial :class:`~authorityspoke.decisions.Decision` 
+we created from the data we downloaded from the CAP API. Then we can verify that 
+those two Holdings are now considered the two holdings of the Decision.
+
+    >>> licensing_case.posit(both_holdings_with_anchors)
+    >>> len(licensing_case.holdings)
+    2

notebooks/load_yaml_holdings.ipynb

@@ -63,6 +63,13 @@
     "print(licensing_case)"
    ]
   },
+  {
+   "cell_type": "markdown",
+   "metadata": {},
+   "source": [
+    "Because we used `full_case=True`, we have the option to view the full text of the majority opinion using the command `licensing_case.majority.text`."
+   ]
+  },
   {
    "cell_type": "markdown",
    "metadata": {},
@@ -688,13 +695,41 @@
     "    client=LEGIS_CLIENT)\n",
     "len(both_holdings_with_anchors.holdings)"
    ]
+  },
+  {
+   "cell_type": "markdown",
+   "metadata": {},
+   "source": [
+    "Now that we generated this `AnchoredHoldings` object containing the data from the YAML file, we can use the `posit` method to link those Holdings to the judicial Decision we created from the data we downloaded from the CAP API. Then we can verify that those two Holdings are now considered the two `holdings` of the Decision."
+   ]
+  },
+  {
+   "cell_type": "code",
+   "execution_count": 14,
+   "metadata": {},
+   "outputs": [
+    {
+     "data": {
+      "text/plain": [
+       "2"
+      ]
+     },
+     "execution_count": 14,
+     "metadata": {},
+     "output_type": "execute_result"
+    }
+   ],
+   "source": [
+    "licensing_case.posit(both_holdings_with_anchors)\n",
+    "len(licensing_case.holdings)"
+   ]
   }
  ],
  "metadata": {
   "kernelspec": {
-   "display_name": "ausvenv",
+   "display_name": "authorityspoke",
    "language": "python",
-   "name": "ausvenv"
+   "name": "authorityspoke"
   },
   "language_info": {
    "codemirror_mode": {
@@ -706,7 +741,7 @@
    "name": "python",
    "nbconvert_exporter": "python",
    "pygments_lexer": "ipython3",
-   "version": "3.9.3"
+   "version": "3.9.5"
   }
  },
  "nbformat": 4,

requirements-docs.txt

@@ -7,6 +7,6 @@ nettlesome>=0.5.0
 pint>=0.15
 python-slugify
 requests
-sphinx>=2.1.2
+sphinx>=4.0.2
 sphinx-autodoc-typehints
 sphinx-rtd-theme