Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

msgpack-0.7 with relaxed upper bounds #57

Closed
nh2 opened this issue May 5, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

msgpack-0.7 with relaxed upper bounds #57

nh2 opened this issue May 5, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@nh2
Copy link

nh2 commented May 5, 2015

Hi,

I saw that you released msgpack-1.0 - congrats!

However, the changes are quite a lot (e.g. switching to binary).

Would you mind making another point release in the 0.7 series that allows higher upper bounds on some standard packages like text,attoparsec,template-haskell?

Currently I have to use --allow-newer to use it, see e.g. here: https://travis-ci.org/nh2/call-haskell-from-anything/jobs/61278874#L184

Thanks!

@hvr
Copy link
Collaborator

hvr commented Mar 27, 2019

Is this still desired?

@nh2
Copy link
Author

nh2 commented Mar 27, 2019

One moment, I will check

@nh2
Copy link
Author

nh2 commented Mar 27, 2019

It looks like I have switched my use cases from https://hackage.haskell.org/package/msgpack to https://hackage.haskell.org/package/data-msgpack since (the latter was made "since the original author is unreachable").

So I personally would no longer need this, given that the other package also claims "This fork incorporates a number of bugfixes and is actively being developed".

@hvr
Copy link
Collaborator

hvr commented Mar 27, 2019

Fair enough; just for the record, effective immediately this library is maintained again :-)

@hvr hvr closed this as completed Mar 27, 2019
@nh2
Copy link
Author

nh2 commented Mar 27, 2019

@hvr OK, good to know!

Have you already had a chance to look at the differences the fork has made so far, maybe some of them are useful to pick back up?

@hvr
Copy link
Collaborator

hvr commented Mar 28, 2019

I skimmed the fork and I think most of the functional non-refactoring changes were already submitted as PRs to this repo (and have been merged). I'll take a closer look at some point in the future to see if there's anything else I'd like to steal back... :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants