Scientist mode experimental #1

Open
wants to merge 20 commits into
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
@TeMPOraL

All changes worked well in tests. Noprocrast is a pretty amazing thing - it boosted subject's work efficiency from 2% to 46%.

@schwa

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@schwa

schwa Feb 13, 2011

I see you left in male nipples. Will this bug ever get fixed?

schwa commented Feb 13, 2011

I see you left in male nipples. Will this bug ever get fixed?

@schwa

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@schwa

schwa Feb 13, 2011

You sure this won't leak?

You sure this won't leak?

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@TeMPOraL

TeMPOraL Feb 13, 2011

Owner

It does not (in 37 out of 42 tests).

Owner

TeMPOraL replied Feb 13, 2011

It does not (in 37 out of 42 tests).

@eltiare

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@eltiare

eltiare Feb 13, 2011

Could you please make it to where the desired effect could be reached via cognition? It's not always possible for the subject to reach coffee, depending on the circumstance.

Could you please make it to where the desired effect could be reached via cognition? It's not always possible for the subject to reach coffee, depending on the circumstance.

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@TeMPOraL

TeMPOraL Feb 13, 2011

Owner

Will think about that for the next release, thanks.

Owner

TeMPOraL replied Feb 13, 2011

Will think about that for the next release, thanks.

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bentomas

bentomas Feb 15, 2011

You'll have to pardon my ignorance here, this isn't my field at all, but this is a joke, right? We can't really be that exact with this DNA, can we?

You'll have to pardon my ignorance here, this isn't my field at all, but this is a joke, right? We can't really be that exact with this DNA, can we?

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@TeMPOraL

TeMPOraL Feb 15, 2011

Owner

It's not my either. It is a joke. Anyway, being exact depends on what you look for. Reaction to caffeine probably isn't encoded directly in the DNA, but some diseases might be caused by specific genes. We can track down the latter. The main problem is that the whole analysis is currently read-only; ie. we can't really modify DNA of a live patient.

Owner

TeMPOraL replied Feb 15, 2011

It's not my either. It is a joke. Anyway, being exact depends on what you look for. Reaction to caffeine probably isn't encoded directly in the DNA, but some diseases might be caused by specific genes. We can track down the latter. The main problem is that the whole analysis is currently read-only; ie. we can't really modify DNA of a live patient.

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cariaso

cariaso Feb 18, 2011

Reality is far simpler, only two edits are warranted.
Reaction to caffeine IS encoded directly in the DNA.

Manu has
rs762551 AA
causing his body to breakdown caffeine at the typical speed. But if he were instead CC his body would do that more slowly requiring fewer trips to the coffee machine and toilet.

He's also
rs5751876 TT
and the scientific paper
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2745641
tells us that as a result he feels more 'jittery' after drinking coffee than most people. So you might want to change that to the more common CC form.

All of this comment is real and verifiable at the various PMIDs mentioned at
http://www.snpedia.com/index.php/Rs762551
and
http://www.snpedia.com/index.php/Rs5751876

You can learn this and much more by reading the file at
http://www.snpedia.com/files/promethease/outputs/genome_Manu_Sporny.html
Then clicking on 'Medicines ...more...' then 'Caffeine ...more...'

As for "we can't really modify DNA of a live patient" -- we do that too.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/11/us-hemophilia-genetherapy-idUSTRE7B90FL20111211

Reality is far simpler, only two edits are warranted.
Reaction to caffeine IS encoded directly in the DNA.

Manu has
rs762551 AA
causing his body to breakdown caffeine at the typical speed. But if he were instead CC his body would do that more slowly requiring fewer trips to the coffee machine and toilet.

He's also
rs5751876 TT
and the scientific paper
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2745641
tells us that as a result he feels more 'jittery' after drinking coffee than most people. So you might want to change that to the more common CC form.

All of this comment is real and verifiable at the various PMIDs mentioned at
http://www.snpedia.com/index.php/Rs762551
and
http://www.snpedia.com/index.php/Rs5751876

You can learn this and much more by reading the file at
http://www.snpedia.com/files/promethease/outputs/genome_Manu_Sporny.html
Then clicking on 'Medicines ...more...' then 'Caffeine ...more...'

As for "we can't really modify DNA of a live patient" -- we do that too.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/11/us-hemophilia-genetherapy-idUSTRE7B90FL20111211

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@TeMPOraL

TeMPOraL Feb 18, 2011

Owner

Thanks for your insight! Your research helped us to improve the subject. See commit f45149a .

Owner

TeMPOraL replied Feb 18, 2011

Thanks for your insight! Your research helped us to improve the subject. See commit f45149a .

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bobthecow

bobthecow Dec 13, 2011

@TeMPOraL @caraiso Good call. I made a similar bugfix in @kennethreitz's genome: bobthecow/kennethreitz-genome@1cdf8ab

@TeMPOraL @caraiso Good call. I made a similar bugfix in @kennethreitz's genome: bobthecow/kennethreitz-genome@1cdf8ab

@poswald

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@poswald

poswald Feb 13, 2011

I wouldn't merge these changes without some test cases.

poswald commented Feb 13, 2011

I wouldn't merge these changes without some test cases.

@zeroeth

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@zeroeth

zeroeth Feb 13, 2011

motor_control.feature

Scenario: Bipedal walking
  Given that I have two legs
  When I put my right foot forward
  Then I should travel some distance
  And I should not fall over

zeroeth commented Feb 13, 2011

motor_control.feature

Scenario: Bipedal walking
  Given that I have two legs
  When I put my right foot forward
  Then I should travel some distance
  And I should not fall over
@jdonaldson

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jdonaldson

jdonaldson Feb 13, 2011

This fails for my tail recursion tests. I noted that the subject had an actual vestigial tail, attached to another tail, etc.

This fails for my tail recursion tests. I noted that the subject had an actual vestigial tail, attached to another tail, etc.

@cariaso

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cariaso

cariaso Feb 13, 2011

The changes above are humorous. The changes at https://github.com/cariaso/dna are real.

cariaso commented Feb 13, 2011

The changes above are humorous. The changes at https://github.com/cariaso/dna are real.

@synhershko

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@synhershko

synhershko Feb 13, 2011

@cariaso now that is funny

@cariaso now that is funny

@MarioRicalde

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@MarioRicalde

MarioRicalde Feb 13, 2011

I would advise to add more resistance to RSI from using EMACS or related editors. This could also improve his speeds when working with other technologies.

I would advise to add more resistance to RSI from using EMACS or related editors. This could also improve his speeds when working with other technologies.

@shaiguitar

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@shaiguitar

shaiguitar Feb 13, 2011

Hah, brilliant :)

Hah, brilliant :)

@TeMPOraL

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@TeMPOraL

TeMPOraL Feb 13, 2011

Nice idea; I'll look for that and try to include in the next release.

Nice idea; I'll look for that and try to include in the next release.

@TeMPOraL

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@TeMPOraL

TeMPOraL Feb 14, 2011

https://github.com/TeMPOraL/dna/tree/scientist-mode-release-0.3
New release, with things that were promised. Share and Enjoy ;).

https://github.com/TeMPOraL/dna/tree/scientist-mode-release-0.3
New release, with things that were promised. Share and Enjoy ;).

@notgeorge

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@notgeorge

notgeorge Feb 14, 2011

I'm interested in porting this over to my current bear-pig platform. Any potential gotchas I should be on the lookout for?

I'm interested in porting this over to my current bear-pig platform. Any potential gotchas I should be on the lookout for?

@ghost

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ghost

ghost Feb 15, 2011

this is highlarious!!! :)

ghost commented Feb 15, 2011

this is highlarious!!! :)

@craic

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@craic

craic Feb 15, 2011

Daddy!

craic commented Feb 15, 2011

Daddy!

@jkopel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jkopel

jkopel Feb 17, 2011

Any chance of removing redundant and unused code? It is taking 9 months to compile every time.

jkopel commented Feb 17, 2011

Any chance of removing redundant and unused code? It is taking 9 months to compile every time.

@TeMPOraL

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@TeMPOraL

TeMPOraL Feb 17, 2011

Hard to tell... it's mostly compiler fault that causes such long build times. I think we should improve the build process.

Hard to tell... it's mostly compiler fault that causes such long build times. I think we should improve the build process.

@wesleywerner

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@wesleywerner

wesleywerner Feb 17, 2011

References to Evolution.Bipedal causes a bottleneck during object creation. Sadly we can't avoid this, we kinda need it.

In some far-off future build, we could hopefully work around this, by piping the build objects through the TestTube framework (instead of the current Gestation framework).

+1 for this! :-)

References to Evolution.Bipedal causes a bottleneck during object creation. Sadly we can't avoid this, we kinda need it.

In some far-off future build, we could hopefully work around this, by piping the build objects through the TestTube framework (instead of the current Gestation framework).

+1 for this! :-)

@roofuskit

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@roofuskit

roofuskit Feb 17, 2011

I suggest removing the code for redundant limbs and appendages to speed up build time.

I suggest removing the code for redundant limbs and appendages to speed up build time.

@cariaso

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cariaso

cariaso Feb 18, 2011

see background at b17a5c0#commitcomment-272600

see background at b17a5c0#commitcomment-272600

@ShiftyAxel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ShiftyAxel

ShiftyAxel Dec 12, 2011

Be sure to implement error checking to avoid potential vulnerability to a stack smash.

Be sure to implement error checking to avoid potential vulnerability to a stack smash.

@andrew0404

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@andrew0404

andrew0404 Nov 22, 2013

Let's just take a part from another genome

Let's just take a part from another genome

@singhanianilesh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@singhanianilesh

singhanianilesh Apr 21, 2015

Dose not pass static analyzer.

Dose not pass static analyzer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment