Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scientist mode experimental #1

Open
wants to merge 20 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

TeMPOraL
Copy link

All changes worked well in tests. Noprocrast is a pretty amazing thing - it boosted subject's work efficiency from 2% to 46%.

@schwa
Copy link

schwa commented Feb 13, 2011

I see you left in male nipples. Will this bug ever get fixed?

@poswald
Copy link

poswald commented Feb 13, 2011

I wouldn't merge these changes without some test cases.

@zeroeth
Copy link

zeroeth commented Feb 13, 2011

motor_control.feature

Scenario: Bipedal walking
  Given that I have two legs
  When I put my right foot forward
  Then I should travel some distance
  And I should not fall over

@jdonaldson
Copy link

This fails for my tail recursion tests. I noted that the subject had an actual vestigial tail, attached to another tail, etc.

@cariaso
Copy link

cariaso commented Feb 13, 2011

The changes above are humorous. The changes at https://github.com/cariaso/dna are real.

@synhershko
Copy link

@cariaso now that is funny

@MarioRicalde
Copy link

I would advise to add more resistance to RSI from using EMACS or related editors. This could also improve his speeds when working with other technologies.

@shaiguitar
Copy link

Hah, brilliant :)

@TeMPOraL
Copy link
Author

Nice idea; I'll look for that and try to include in the next release.

@TeMPOraL
Copy link
Author

https://github.com/TeMPOraL/dna/tree/scientist-mode-release-0.3
New release, with things that were promised. Share and Enjoy ;).

@notgeorge
Copy link

I'm interested in porting this over to my current bear-pig platform. Any potential gotchas I should be on the lookout for?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 15, 2011

this is highlarious!!! :)

@craic
Copy link

craic commented Feb 15, 2011

Daddy!

@jkopel
Copy link

jkopel commented Feb 17, 2011

Any chance of removing redundant and unused code? It is taking 9 months to compile every time.

@TeMPOraL
Copy link
Author

Hard to tell... it's mostly compiler fault that causes such long build times. I think we should improve the build process.

@wesleywerner
Copy link

References to Evolution.Bipedal causes a bottleneck during object creation. Sadly we can't avoid this, we kinda need it.

In some far-off future build, we could hopefully work around this, by piping the build objects through the TestTube framework (instead of the current Gestation framework).

+1 for this! :-)

@roofuskit
Copy link

I suggest removing the code for redundant limbs and appendages to speed up build time.

@singhanianilesh
Copy link

Dose not pass static analyzer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet