Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add moreutils pee utility #25

the-Arioch opened this Issue Aug 2, 2012 · 3 comments


None yet
3 participants

making hooks as solid files is probably well equipped for "less is more" approach

But hook folders like rc.d are more flexible.

And it seems there is a simple way to make them - http://zgp.org/~dmarti/tips/git-multiple-post-receive-hooks

If only there was pee.exe in git/win


sschuberth commented Nov 4, 2012

This answer on serverfault says there would be no need for pee with bash. Can you confirm this?

that is a different usecase. I asked there for clarification, maybe they'd come with some hint. Thanks for finding the link!


sschuberth commented Nov 5, 2012

By now there's an comment on serverfault saying that "the bash syntax won't work with the hooks-joker technique". Thus, having the moreutils package would probably make sense. However, as we mostly rely on what MSYS packages are available upstream, I'd like to ask you to take your request to the MinGW / MSYS tracker. If they include moreutils, we'll get it for free.

@sschuberth sschuberth closed this Nov 5, 2012

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment