New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[docs] Improve the onboarding #10639
[docs] Improve the onboarding #10639
Conversation
5d94112
to
9d696b7
Compare
45e4512
to
4fa413c
Compare
Any better idea? |
4fa413c
to
1439873
Compare
Perhaps put the installation and usage into Cards, so their sections have defined bounds, giving them equal visual weight. Then remove all the excess text from the Sponsors section, put the gold sponsors side-by-side (centered) without reference to Patreon or OpenCollective or dollar amounts, then add a row below smaller logos of silver sponsors (I think it's a mistake not to mention Facebook on the home page). Links to sponsorship platforms can go below that. CT's logo could link to the free Material theme (for now), and in the interest of fairness, the CEA one should link probably to their site rather than OC. |
It should be good like this. The imbalance will be address with the themes. I don't think that adding an elevation with a Paper will improve the situation. It look fine on Bootstrap side.
I have already tried to remove anything non-important.
It's encouraging people to contribute first to Patreon then to OpenCollective.
It's giving them and other potential contributors to give more. I agree that having Facebook as a sponsor is a good thing. You can find them in https://material-ui.com/discover-more/backers/.
The OpenCollective sponsors are handled by their CDN right now. The nice thing about it is that we have nothing to handle. New contributors will be added automatically, as well as being sorted by the total number of money they donated DESC. |
Somewhat
It isn't about elevation, it's about giving the containers a visible size so they appear more balanced when the content has differing visual weight. It works as well without the shadow. In fact, I just noticed Bootstrap have done the same.
I think you're missing that the purpose of this section os to promote the sponsors. The sponsorship opportunity is implicit. Links to Patreon and OC is enough.
Yes, I guessed the motivation. It's taken care of.
So is having a second tier labelled silver sponsors, with smaller logos, but I missed that FB are only Bronze, thought they were silver, so it isn't necessary.
I missed that this redirects to the sponsor, rather then to their OC profile page, so yes, it's fine. |
I agree. I think that it's much better without the shadow. What about reducing the contrast between the white and the grey? So we can soften the container borders.
Yeah, why not. I was following webpack here but I have no objection to go into vue side.
It's more implicit in your proposal. I do prefer the vue approach: |
I thought the same - it was just a mockup.
Perhaps when there are enough sponsors to justify the distinction? |
Brings what I can from #10616 to HEAD. The other branch might be on hold for quite some time.